Fracture strength of different veneers on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks in implant-supported single crowns
| dc.contributor.author | Tekin, Samet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Demirci, Fatih | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bakir, Metin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:20:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) single crowns veneered with different materials produced by computer-aided design (CAD)-computer-aided manufacture (CAM) after aging. Methods: 60 stainless-steel master dies were prepared with a 1 mm-wide deep chamfer. Sixty PEEK frameworks were produced with a CAD-CAM system for the right maxillary first molar tooth on the dies. PEEK frameworks were divided into six groups (n= 10) according to veneering materials (five CAD-CAM materials and a resin composite). Group ZR: monolithic zirconia (Upcera ST-Color); Group EC: lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD); Group LU: resin nano-ceramic (Lava Ultimate); Group VM: feldspathic ceramic (Vitablocs Mark II); Group VS: zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glassceramic (VITA Suprinity); and Group CR: indirect resin composite (Gradia). All samples were subjected to a fracture strength test in a universal test device after thermo-mechanical aging and then the results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. In addition, post-fracture analyses of all samples were performed with a stereomicroscope. Results: The differences in fracture strength values of different veneer materials in single crowns with a PEEK framework were statistically significant (P< 0.05). Fracture strength was highest in Group ZR (1665 N), followed by Groups LU (1440 N), EC (1249 N), CR (918 N), VS (754 N), and VM (655 N). | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 171 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0894-8275 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-8883-8307 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-8744-5592 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35986930 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85137008647 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 167 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/53565 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 35 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000893228400001 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Mosher & Linder, Inc | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Dentistry | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Shock Absorption Capacity | |
| dc.subject | Cad/Cam Composite Resin | |
| dc.subject | Fixed Dental Prostheses | |
| dc.subject | in-Vitro Fatigue | |
| dc.subject | Restorative Materials | |
| dc.subject | Surface Modification | |
| dc.subject | Complication Rates | |
| dc.subject | Bond Strength | |
| dc.subject | Performance | |
| dc.subject | Resistance | |
| dc.title | Fracture strength of different veneers on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks in implant-supported single crowns | |
| dc.type | Article |







