Disinfection of synthetic and real municipal wastewater effluent by flow-through pulsed UV-light treatment system

dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gulsad
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Ali
dc.contributor.authorRegan, John M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:48:43Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to characterize the efficacy of flow-through pulsed UV light for inactivation of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis spores in synthetic (SMWE) and real municipal wastewater effluent (RMWE). The results show that complete inactivation was observed with a 10 L/min flow rate for E. coil and 6 L/min flow rate for B. subtilis using one-pass pulsed UV treatment and SMWE. For two-pass treatment, complete inactivation was observed in SMWE with a 16 L/min flow rate for E. coil and 10 L/min flow rate for B. subtilis. On the other hand, complete inactivation was observed with 10 L/min flow rate treatments for E. coil in RMWE, whereas 4.15 Log reduction was observed at 6 L/min for B. subtilis in RMWE for one pass. The raw wastewater was also treated under flow-through pulsed UV light at 10 L/min flow rate and complete inactivation was observed. The treatment resulted in significant chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) reductions. These results clearly indicate that pulsed UV not only successfully disinfects the wastewater effluent, but also reduces the organic load of municipal wastewater effluent. Therefore, pulsed UV technology can be an alternative for chlorine and conventional UV light for municipal wastewater effluent. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK); Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) and the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station. We are thank to the Xenon Corp., Wilmington, Mass., U.S.A. for providing technical assistance for the pulsed UV system, and to Alex Roll in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of the Pennsylvania State University for providing assistance with COD and TOC analyses.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.02.004
dc.identifier.endpage97
dc.identifier.issn2214-7144
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5304-9436
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0507-1129
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2049-5026
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84959036519
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage89
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.02.004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/61534
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000431389000010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Water Process Engineering
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectFlow-through
dc.subjectPulsed UV
dc.subjectInactivation
dc.subjectDisinfection
dc.subjectWastewater
dc.titleDisinfection of synthetic and real municipal wastewater effluent by flow-through pulsed UV-light treatment system
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar