A magnetite-rich Cyprus-type VMS deposit in Ortaklar: A unique VMS style in the Tethyan metallogenic belt, Gaziantep, Turkey
| dc.contributor.author | Yildirim, Nail | |
| dc.contributor.author | Donmez, Cahit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang, Jisuk | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Insung | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pirajno, Franco | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yildirim, Esra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chang, Se Won | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:48:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Ortaklar VMS deposit is hosted in the Kocali Complex consisting of basalts and deep sea pelagic sediments, which formed by rifting and continental break-up of the southern Neotethyan in Late Triassic. The basalts are of NMORB-type without notable crustal contamination. From the surface to depth, the Ortaklar deposit consists of a gossan zone, a thick massive ore zone and a poorly developed stockwork zone. Primary mineralisation is characterised by distinctive facies including sulphide breccias (proximal), graded beds (distal), stockworks and chimney fragments. Ore mineral abundances decrease in the order of pyrite, magnetite, chalcopyrite, and sphalerite. Two distinct phases of mineralisation, massive magnetite and massive sulphide, are present in the Ortaklar deposit. Textural evidence (e.g., magnetite replacing sulphides) and the spatial relationships with the host rocks indicate that magnetite and sulphide minerals were generated in different stages. The transition from sulphide to magnetite mineralisation is interpreted to relate to variation in H2S content of ore fluids. The 1st stage massive sulphide ore might have formed by early hydrothermal fluids rich in Fe and H2S. The 2nd stage massive magnetite might have formed by later neutral hydrothermal fluids rich in Fe but poor in H2S, replacing the pre-existing sulphide ore. The alteration patterns, mineral paragenesis, lithological features (massive ore-stocicwork ore-gossan) of the Ortaklar deposit together with its trace elements, Cu-Pb-Zn-Au-Ag and REE signatures are all consistent with a Cyprus-type VMS system. The delta S-34 values in pyrite and chalcopyrite samples range from 2.6 to 5.7%., indicating that the hydrothermal fluids were associated with sub-seafloor igneous activity, typical of Cyprus-type VMS deposits. However, magnetite formed later than sulphide minerals in the Ortaklar deposit, contrasting with typical Cyprus-type VMS deposits where magnetite generally occurs in lower sections. Consequently, although the Ortaklar deposit generally conforms to Cyprus-type deposits, it is distinguished from them by its late stage and high magnetite concentration. Thus, the Ortaklar deposit is thought to be an exceptional and perhaps unique Cyprus-type VMS deposit. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2014R1A1A2055049]; BK21 scholarship through School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Korea; Inha University Research Grant | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2014R1A1A2055049). Jisuk Kang was partially supported by the BK21 scholarship through School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Korea. We thank the Resource Geology Laboratory members of Seoul National University for their assistance in analyses using EPMA, XRD, and ICP-MS. We also thank Dr. Hoek Joost of the stable isotope laboratory of the University of Maryland for help in sample fluorination and the measurement of sulphur isotopes. JHS is supported by Inha University Research Grant. We wish to thank Mr. Celal YILDIZ of Miryildiz Limited Co. for allowing us to access to the Ortaklar Deposit. We thank to Serkan OZKOMOS, Dr. Semiha ILHAN, Dr. Yahya CIFTCI and Mahmut EROGLU, Dr. Pinar SEN, Dr. Sandra Cecilia Miano, Burcu GOREN and Hulya AGCIL for their various helps. We are grateful to Drs. Mohammad Hassan Karimpour, Xueming Yang and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable and constructive reviews that greatly improved the manuscript. Dr. Peter C. Lightfoot (Associated editor of ORG) is acknowledged for his time and efforts of editing the manuscript. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/i.oregeorev.2016.05.021 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 442 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0169-1368 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1872-7360 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-3358-1185 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-3388-612X | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-4705-9301 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-6870-6593 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-1082-3548 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-0823-988X | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-7459-5746 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84976302989 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 425 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/i.oregeorev.2016.05.021 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/61590 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 79 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000381832500025 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ore Geology Reviews | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Tethyan | |
| dc.subject | Kocali Complex | |
| dc.subject | Mafic volcanics | |
| dc.subject | Ortaklar VMS deposit | |
| dc.subject | Cyprus type | |
| dc.subject | Hydrothermal | |
| dc.subject | Massive magnetite | |
| dc.subject | Massive sulphide | |
| dc.title | A magnetite-rich Cyprus-type VMS deposit in Ortaklar: A unique VMS style in the Tethyan metallogenic belt, Gaziantep, Turkey | |
| dc.type | Article |







