Effects of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine with Propofol on Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion, Hemodynamic Stability, and Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidity: A Prospective Study of 80 Patients

dc.contributor.authorÇakırgöz, Mensure
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorAkan, Mert
dc.contributor.authorAlaygut, Ergin
dc.contributor.authorSaraç, Ömürhan
dc.contributor.authorKar, Aysun Afife
dc.contributor.authorYurtlu, Derya Arslan
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:11:32Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Propofol is the most commonly used hypnotic for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion but requires high doses when used alone, potentially causing cardiorespiratory depression. Muscle relaxants are recommended, yet no study has assessed the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine before propofol induction on LMA insertion conditions. This prospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of propofol administered with remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine during short-duration operations requiring LMA placement. Material/Methods: Eighty premedicated ASA I-II patients (age 18-65 years) were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (Group D=40) or remifentanil (Group R=40) before propofol induction. Group D received a 10-minute infusion (1 ?g.kg), while Group R received remifentanil (2 ?g.kg) over 60 seconds. Baseline systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) values were recorded before induction and at intervals up to 5 minutes after LMA placement. Results: Group R had significantly shorter eyelash reflex loss and LMA insertion times, but longer apnea duration. Ideal LMA insertion conditions, full chin opening, and no movement were more frequent in Group R (p<0.05). In Group D, HR was significantly lower than in Group R 1 minute before and after LMA insertion, but significantly higher in the 4th and 5th minutes after insertion (p<0.05). MAP in Group R was significantly lower than in Group D at 1 minute before and all times after LMA insertion (p<0.05). Conclusions: Administration of 2 ?g/kg remifentanil before 2.5 mg/kg propofol induction resulted in better hemodynamics, faster LMA insertion, and higher rates of optimal conditions compared to 1 ?g/kg dexmedetomidine © Med Sci Monit, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/MSM.948186
dc.identifier.issn1234-1010
dc.identifier.pmid40369863
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105005174636
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.948186
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/42533
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Scientific Information, Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Science Monitor
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260511
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Spinal; Hemodynamics
dc.titleEffects of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine with Propofol on Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion, Hemodynamic Stability, and Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidity: A Prospective Study of 80 Patients
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar