Effect of phthalocyanine, methylene blue and toluidine blue photosensitizers on the adhesive interface of fiber posts: a confocal laser microscopy study

dc.contributor.authorGok, Tuba
dc.contributor.authorKaraoglu, Gamze Er
dc.contributor.authorKorucu, Hulde
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:39:37Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPhthalocyanine (Pc) is a promising photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT), offering advantages such as high light stability, strong absorption, efficient singlet oxygen production, and low dark toxicity. This study evaluated the effects of PDT with different photosensitizers on the penetration depth and area of self-adhesive resin cement into dentinal tubules. Forty single-canal, round-shaped lower premolar teeth were prepared using the ProTaper Next system. After root canals were filled with the single cone technique, samples were stored for 7 days. Post spaces were created, and samples were divided into four groups: control, methylene blue (MB), toluidine blue (TB), and Pc groups. PDT was performed using photosensitizers combined with light-emitting diodes (LEDs). 1.0 mm +/- 0.1 axial sections were taken from the 1, 5, and 8 mm levels from the orifice. The penetration depth and area of self-adhesive resin cement into dentinal tubules were analyzed using a confocal laser microscope. Statistical analyses were conducted using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Cement penetration depth decreased from coronal to apical sections in all groups. At the 1 mm level, MB showed a greater penetration area than Pc, while at the 5 mm level, MB showed a lower penetration area than the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found at the 8 mm level. This study showed that while adhesive penetration depth did not differ significantly among groups, penetration area varied at 1 mm and 5 mm sections. Methylene blue exhibited a higher penetration area at 1 mm compared to phthalocyanine, whereas toluidine blue showed consistent penetration across sections. In terms of penetration depth and area findings, the findings showed that PC can be used as an alternative photosensitizer in PDT application in endodontics, showing generally similar findings with MB and TB.
dc.description.sponsorshipFimath;rat University
dc.description.sponsorshipNot applicable.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-025-04369-z
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.issn1435-604X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7389-9470
dc.identifier.pmid40042533
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-86000065014
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04369-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/58902
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001439667800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofLasers in Medical Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectAdhesive interface
dc.subjectConfocal laser microscopy
dc.subjectDentin tubule penetration
dc.subjectFiber post
dc.subjectPhotodynamic therapy
dc.subjectPhotosensitizer
dc.titleEffect of phthalocyanine, methylene blue and toluidine blue photosensitizers on the adhesive interface of fiber posts: a confocal laser microscopy study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar