Comparison of the Effect of Adhesive Protocols and Light Curing Units on the Repair Bond Strength of Bulk Fill Composite Resins
| dc.contributor.author | Bilge, Kübra | |
| dc.contributor.author | İpek, İrem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aşar, Enes Mustafa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T16:15:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) of a microhybrid composite resin (CR) after repair with 3 different bulk fill CR using 2nd and 3rd generation light-emitting diode (LED) light devices and a universal adhesive applied with different protocols. Methods: 120 acrylic blocks, each with an open surface and a depth of 2 mm and a diameter of 6 mm, were filled with a microhybrid CR (Filtek Z250) and cured with an LED for 20 seconds. The samples were roughened for 5 seconds with a diamond fissure bur under water cooling and then subjected to 5,000 thermal cycles. A universal adhesive was applied to the prepared samples using two different protocols (total etch and self-etch), and samples were then filled with bulk fill CRs. Each bulk fill CR group was polymerized with 2nd and 3rd generation LED to form subgroups (n=10). The SBS values were recorded in MPa using a universal testing device. Results: The highest SBS values were obtained for the X-tra Fil group in total etch mode with polymerization using 3rd generation LED, while the lowest SBS values were found for Filtek One Bulk Fill group in self-etch mode with polymerization using the 3rd generation LED. In all groups, total etch mode yielded higher SBS values compared to self-etch mode. Conclusion: Different adhesive protocols and LCUs were found to affect the SBS values of bulk fill CRs during repair. © 2024, Selcuk University. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15311/selcukdentj.1512564 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 302 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2148-7529 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105007718965 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 299 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1512564 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/43519 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 11 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Selcuk University | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Selcuk Dental Journal | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_Scopus_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Adhesive Protocols; Bulk Fill Composite; Composite Repair; LED Units | |
| dc.title | Comparison of the Effect of Adhesive Protocols and Light Curing Units on the Repair Bond Strength of Bulk Fill Composite Resins | |
| dc.title.alternative | Adeziv Protokollerinin ve Işıkla Sertleştirme Ünitelerinin Bulk Fill Kompozit Rezinlerin Tamir Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerindeki Etkisinin Karşılaştırılması | |
| dc.type | Article |







