Do rhomboid flaps provide more elongation than Z-plasty flaps? An experimental study
| dc.contributor.author | Altun, Serdar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cakir, Fatih | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oztan, Mehmet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Okur, Mehmet Ihsan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bal, Ali | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:17:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background and aim: A Z-plasty flap is one of the most widely used geometric relaxation methods to release contracture bands. A rhomboid flap is a lesser used geometric relaxation method than a Z-plasty flap. This study aimed to determine the length and rate of elongation provided by rhomboid and Z-plasty flaps. Methods: Bilateral contracture bands were created in the inguinal skins of rats. A rhomboid flap was planned for the right side of the inguinal region, and a single Z-plasty flap was planned for the left side. The length and rate of elongation provided by the two flaps were calculated after completing the procedures and were compared using Student's t-test. Results: Experimental contracture bands disappeared in both the inguinal regions after creating rhomboid and Z-plasty flaps. The mean postoperative elongation of the contracture band was 1.4 +/- 0.119 and 2.47 +/- 0.281cm using the rhomboid and Z-plasty flaps, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p < .001). Conclusion: Z-plasty flaps provide more elongation than rhomboid flaps and also appear to be better options for releasing linear contracture bands. However, rhomboid flaps may be used as alternatives when Z-plasty flaps cannot be used and in regions such as the axilla, genital region, nipple-areola, where their distortion effects should be avoided. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/2000656X.2017.1372287 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 152 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2000-656X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2000-6764 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 28868941 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85028815777 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 148 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2017.1372287 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/52631 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 52 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000427727400002 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Contracture | |
| dc.subject | Z-plasty flap | |
| dc.subject | rhomboid flap | |
| dc.subject | length of elongation | |
| dc.title | Do rhomboid flaps provide more elongation than Z-plasty flaps? An experimental study | |
| dc.type | Article |







