Outcome of Our Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Applications

dc.contributor.authorTurkcuoglu, Peykan
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, Burak
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Sermal
dc.contributor.authorCeliker, Ulku
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:10:03Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the outcome of our 4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injections. Method: We evaluated the best corrected visual acuity (LogMAR), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) before and 1(st), 3(rd), 6(th) months after IVTA injection in 97 eyes of 87 patients consisted from diabetic macular edema (47 eyes), central retinal (CRV) (17) and branched retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) (7) and age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) (26) patients, retrospectively. Results: Mean visual acuity before and 1st, 3rd, 6th months after injections were 0.87 +/- 0.58, 0.82 +/- 0.55, 0.73 +/- 0.49, 0.72 +/- 0.46 in diabetic macular edema group; 1.35 +/- 0.35, 1.22 +/- 0.45, 1.18 +/- 0.47, 1.17 +/- 0.49 in CRVO group; 1.12 +/- 0.49, 0.94 +/- 0.54, 0.90 +/- 0.57, 0.85 +/- 0.61 in BRVO group; 1.25 +/- 0.45, 1.33 +/- 0.37, 1.20 +/- 0.53, 1.31 +/- 0.42 in ARMD group, respectively. The only statistical significant increasement in visual acuity was detected in the 3rd (*p:0.003, *p:0.044) and 6th month (*p:0.002, *p:0.046) in the diabetic macula edema and CRVO groups. The visual acuity alterations in other groups and IOP alterations in all groups did not show any significant difference from the baseline (p>0.05). In FFA at the 6 th month, in diabetic macular edema group and CRVO group macular edema markedly decreased in 15 eyes (% 32) and 10 eyes (% 59), minimally decreased in 25 eyes (% 53) and 7 eyes (% 41), respectively. In BRVO group in 7 eyes (% 100) decreased minimally. In ARMD patients there was not any documented leakage. Conclusion: IVTA injection resulted statistical significant increasement in the visual acuity in macular edema secondary to diabetes mellitus and CRVO. There was not any significant IOP change starting from the 1st month till the 6th month after the injection.
dc.identifier.endpage54
dc.identifier.issn1300-0659
dc.identifier.issn2147-2661
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage48
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/50555
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000218767400009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherTurkish Ophthalmological Soc
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Oftalmoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectTriamcinolone acetonide
dc.subjectmacular edema
dc.subjectintraocular pressure
dc.titleOutcome of Our Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Applications
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar