Collective teacher efficacy beliefs: testing measurement invariance using alignment optimization among four cultures

dc.contributor.authorDa'as, Rima'a
dc.contributor.authorQadach, Mowafaq
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Ufuk
dc.contributor.authorSchwabsky, Nitza
dc.contributor.authorSchechter, Chen
dc.contributor.authorTschannen-Moran, Megan
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:36:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose Collective teacher efficacy (CTE) is a promising construct for understanding how schools can foster student achievement. Although much of the early research on CTE took place in North America, researchers from other parts of the world are now delving into this topic. The current study explores whether these powerful collective beliefs function similarly across diverse cultural and linguistic groups: Arab and Jewish teachers in Israel, and teachers in Turkey and the USA. Design/methodology/approach Participants included 4,216 teachers from Israel, Turkey and the USA, representing four cultures: Arab, Jewish, Turkish and American. We tested configural invariance using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (AMOS) and alignment optimization (Mplus) to identify the groups in which specific parameters are noninvariant, and to compare the latent factor means. Findings Configural invariance showed adequate fit of the model structure across the four groups. Based on invariance tests, using the alignment optimization method, CTE scales held different meanings for specific items across the four cultures, where the USA and Arab cultures were the sources of these differences. Furthermore, in comparing the two-dimensional CTE belief scale across the four groups, latent means revealed the highest mean ranking for the USA and the lowest for Turkey. Originality/value This research makes a significant theoretical contribution by examining and comparing the concept of teachers' collective efficacy in multiple cultures. This comparison can also contribute to instructional teaching practices worldwide.
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JEA-02-2021-0032
dc.identifier.endpage187
dc.identifier.issn0957-8234
dc.identifier.issn1758-7395
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7389-0433
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7248-1972
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120700482
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage167
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2021-0032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/57934
dc.identifier.volume60
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000722824400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Educational Administration
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectAlignment
dc.subjectMeasurement invariance
dc.subjectCollective teacher efficacy
dc.subjectMultigroup confirmatory factor analysis
dc.titleCollective teacher efficacy beliefs: testing measurement invariance using alignment optimization among four cultures
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar