Analysis of Different Production Systems in Laying Hen Enterprises with Analytic Hierarchy Process in Turkey

dc.contributor.authorTuncel, S.
dc.contributor.authorSipahi, C.
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, A.
dc.contributor.authorAltin, O.
dc.contributor.authorSariozkan, S.
dc.contributor.authorGokdai, A.
dc.contributor.authorArikan, M. S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:20:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe present study aimed to evaluated the enterprises engaged in conventional cage, enriched cage, free-range and organic egg production in Turkey in terms of four different criteria (profit, investment cost, animal welfare/health and sales/marketing) using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). For this purpose, the questionnaires through face-to-face interviews were conducted with a total of 64 producers who had been determined by random sampling method from 5 different regions included 17 Provinces between November 2016 and March 2019, and primary data were obtained. As a result, it has been found strategically significant that enterprises, to be engaged at the level of 47.0%, 20.0%, 18.0% and 15.0% in conventional, enriched, free-range and organic cage systems, respectively, in the market in terms of profit, investment cost, animal welfare/health and sales /marketing criteria. In addition, in the enterprises within the scope of the research, the profit, investment cost, sales/marketing and animal welfare/health criteria were determined as the dominant criteria at the level of 53.5%, 22.0%, 13.5% and 11.0% respectively. In conclusion, the conventional cage system is dominant with the rates of 55.0% for profit and 53.0% for investment cost criteria, and both of the conventional and enriched systems in terms of sales/marketing criteria are 38.5% dominant and the organic system in terms of animal welfare/health is 46.0% dominant.
dc.description.sponsorshipKirikkale University Scientific Research Unit [201680]; Academy of Finland (AKA) [201680] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was financially supported by Kirikkale University Scientific Research Unit (Project code: 201680).
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1208
dc.identifier.issn1516-635X
dc.identifier.issn1806-9061
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4434-1419
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3575-1835
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7767-4781
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5509-2171
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6263-5181
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7364-6230
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121809740
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1208
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/53403
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000729303400003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFacta-Fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Poultry Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectAnalytical hierarchy process
dc.subjectcommercial laying enterprises
dc.subjectegg
dc.subjectorganic system
dc.subjecttraditional cage system
dc.titleAnalysis of Different Production Systems in Laying Hen Enterprises with Analytic Hierarchy Process in Turkey
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar