Comparative Stress Analysis of Custom-Made PEEK Dental Post-Cores versus Conventional Post-Cores in Incisor Restorations: A Finite Element Study

dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Semsettin
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Samet
dc.contributor.authorKizilkaya, Ayse Rencber
dc.contributor.authorAkgun, Semih Ercan
dc.contributor.authorDeger, Yalcin
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: We conducted a finite element analysis to evaluate stress levels in incisor teeth restored with custom poly-etheretherketone (PEEK) dental post-cores compared to conventional post-cores.Material/Methods: Using micro-computed tomography (& mu;CT) imaging data, a 3D model of a maxillary incisor was created. For each material type, 3D mesh models were developed via specialized software. Two post diameters, 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm, were considered. Five different post materials were examined: Unfilled polyetheretherketone (Group UP); Glass fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (Group GP); Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (Group CP); Metal (Group M); and Zirconia ceramic (Group Z). Each model underwent finite element analysis, after which the von Mises equivalent stress values were determined.Results: For models involving both wide and narrow diameter posts across the crown, crown cement, post cement, and dentin, PEEK posts (Group UP, GP, and CP) exhibited higher von Mises stress values than Groups Z and M. However, the reverse trend was noticed in the post model itself. In the post cement model, stress values ap-peared similar only for the narrow-diameter post groups. Notably, results for Groups Z and M were largely con-sistent with each other.Conclusions: PEEK posts, which have a lower modulus of elasticity, demonstrated different stress values when contrasted with zirconia and metal posts. As the post diameter expanded, the residual dentin decreased, influencing the stress values among various materials. Further in vitro and clinical examinations are essential to comprehen-sively understand PEEK posts.
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/MSM.940887
dc.identifier.issn1643-3750
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8883-8307
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6621-3365
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7266-8593
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0377-7953
dc.identifier.pmid37587670
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85168240403
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940887
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/53786
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001060272300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInt Scientific Information, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Science Monitor
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectFinite Element Analysis
dc.subjectpolyetheretherketone
dc.titleComparative Stress Analysis of Custom-Made PEEK Dental Post-Cores versus Conventional Post-Cores in Incisor Restorations: A Finite Element Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar