The efficacy of droperidol, metoclopramide, propofol, and ondansetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting following middle ear surgery

dc.contributor.authorKarlidag, Turgut
dc.contributor.authorKaygusuz, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorBestaş, Azize
dc.contributor.authorKeleş, Erol
dc.contributor.authorDemirbag, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorYalçin, Sinasi
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:13:09Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The efficacy and reliability of prophylactic antiemetic therapy with low dose propofol, droperidol, metoclopramide, and ondansetron were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, and prospective design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 ASA I-II patients (34 females, 67 males; age range 16 to 53 years) undergoing middle ear surgery for chronic otitis media or its sequelae were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic antiemetic therapy with propofol (n=21, 0.5 mg/kg), droperidol (n=19, 20 mg/kg), metoclopramide (n=23, 0.2 mg/kg), ondansetron (n=21, 4 mg), and placebo (n=20, 0.9% NaCl). All drugs were administered intravenously five minutes before extubation. RESULTS: In the early postoperative period (0 to 3 hours), the percentages of patients free from nausea and vomiting were 100% with droperidol, 71.4% with ondansetron and propofol, 52.1% with metoclopramide, and 35% with placebo. Ondansetron (90.4%) was found the most effective to prevent and control nausea and vomiting during the postoperative 3 to 24 hours, followed by droperidol (84.2%), propofol (57.1%), metoclopramide (47.8%), and placebo (40%). Compared with controls, the number of patients without nausea and vomiting was significantly greater in each treatment group but metoclopramide (p<0.05). No significant differences were detected with respect to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Droperidol and ondansetron seem to exert the highest efficacy to prevent nausea and vomiting during the postoperative 0 to 3 hours and 3 to 24 hours, respectively.
dc.identifier.endpage336
dc.identifier.issn1300-7475
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid12471278
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0036730703
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage331
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/42876
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.ispartofKulak burun bogaz ihtisas dergisi : KBB = Journal of ear, nose, and throat
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260511
dc.subjectAdolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Droperidol; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intraoperative Period; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Ondansetron; Otitis Media; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Propofol; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; antiemetic agent; droperidol; metoclopramide; ondansetron; propofol; adolescent; adult; article; chronic disease; clinical trial; controlled clinical trial; controlled study; double blind procedure; female; human; intraoperative period; intravenous drug administration; male; middle aged; otitis media; postoperative nausea and vomiting; prospective study; randomized controlled trial; treatment outcome
dc.titleThe efficacy of droperidol, metoclopramide, propofol, and ondansetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting following middle ear surgery
dc.title.alternativeOrta kulak cerrahisi sonrasinda oluşan bulanti ve kusmada droperidol, metoklopramid, propofol ve ondansetronun etkinligi.
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar