Comparison of push-recovery control methods for Robotics-OP2 using ankle strategy

dc.contributor.authorAslan, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorArserim, Muhammet Ali
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Aysegul
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this study is to develop push-recovery controllers for bipedal humanoid robots. In bipedal humanoid robots, occur balance problems against external pushes. In this article, control methods that will be the solution to the balance problems in humanoid robots are proposed. We aim to ensure that bipedal robots that behave like humans can come to a position of balance against external pushes. When people encounter balance problems as a result of outside pushes, they respond quite successfully. This ability is limited in bipedal humanoid robots. The main reason for this is the complex structures and limited capacities of humanoid robots. In the real world, there are push-recovery strategies created by considering the reactions of people in case of balance disorder. These strategies; are ankle, hip, and step strategies. In this study, the ankle strategy, from the push-recovery strategies, was used. Different control methods have been tried with the ankle strategy. Three different techniques of control were utilized in the applications. These methods are as follows; Classical control method is PD, Model Predictive Control (MPC) based on prediction, and Deep Q Network (DQN) as deep reinforcement learning algorithm. The applications were carried out on the Robotis-OP2 robot. Simulation tests were done in 3D in the Webots simulator. The humanoid robot was tested with three methods and the results were compared. It has been determined that the Deep Q Network algorithm gives the best results among these methods.
dc.identifier.doi10.17341/gazimmfd.1359434
dc.identifier.issn1300-1884
dc.identifier.issn1304-4915
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5253-3779
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0181-3658
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195547828
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.trdizinid1257620
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1359434
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1257620
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/53930
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001272222700002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherGazi Univ, Fac Engineering Architecture
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectPush-Recovery
dc.subjectRobotis-OP2
dc.subjectDeep Q Network
dc.subjectModel Predictive Control
dc.subjectPD
dc.titleComparison of push-recovery control methods for Robotics-OP2 using ankle strategy
dc.title.alternativeAyak bileği stratejisi kullanarak Robotis-OP2 için itme kurtarma kontrol yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar