A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk

dc.contributor.authorCigdem, Unal Kantekin
dc.contributor.authorSevinc, Sahin
dc.contributor.authorEsef, Bolat
dc.contributor.authorSureyya, Ozturk
dc.contributor.authorMuzaffer, Gencer
dc.contributor.authorAkif, Demirel
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:40:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods: Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n=50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n=50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n=50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results: There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p < 0.05). Group III had lower number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop compared to that of Group I and Group II. Mean while Group I had higher number of squamous epithelial cells in the third drop compared to the other groups. The number of squamous epithelial cells in the first and third drops was statistically similar in each group respectively (p > 0.05 for each group). Conclusions: In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles. (C) 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjan.2017.04.011
dc.identifier.endpage471
dc.identifier.issn0034-7094
dc.identifier.issn1806-907X
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid28526468
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85020087005
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage468
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2017.04.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/45632
dc.identifier.volume67
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000410695100004
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isopt
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectSpinal anesthesia
dc.subjectCerebrospinat fluid
dc.subjectSpinal needles
dc.subjectEpithelial cells
dc.titleA comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
dc.title.alternativeComparação de três agulhas diferentes usadas para raquianestesia em relação ao risco de transporte de células epiteliais escamosas
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar