Prediction of viral-host interactions of COVID-19 by computational methods

dc.contributor.authorAlakus, Talha Burak
dc.contributor.authorTurkoglu, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T18:07:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractExperimental approaches are currently used to determine viral-host interactions, but these approaches are both time-consuming and costly. For these reasons, computational-based approaches are recommended. In this study, using computational-based approaches, viral-host interactions of SARS-CoV-2 virus and human proteins were predicted. The study consists of four different stages; in the first stage viral and host protein sequences were obtained. In the second stage, protein sequences were converted into numerical expressions by various protein mapping methods. These methods are entropy-based, AVL-tree, FIBHASH, binary encoding, CPNR, PAM250, BLOSUM62, Atchley factors, Meiler parameters, EIIP, AESNN1, Miyazawa energies, Micheletti potentials, Z -scale, and hydrophobicity. In the third stage, a deep learning model was designed and BiLSTM was used for this. In the last stage, the protein sequences were classified, and the viral-host interactions were predicted. The performances of protein mapping methods were determined by accuracy, F1-score, specificity, sensitivity, and AUC scores. According to the classification results, the best classification process was obtained by the entropy -based method. With this method, 94.74% accuracy, and 0.95 AUC score were calculated. Then, the most suc-cessful classification process was performed with the Z-scale and 91.23% accuracy, and 0.96 AUC score were obtained. Although other protein mapping methods are not as efficient as Z-scale and entropy-based methods, they have achieved successful classification. AVL-tree, FIBHASH, binary encoding, CPNR, PAM250, BLOSUM62, Atchley factors, Meiler parameters and AESNN1 methods showed over 80% accuracy, F1-score, and AUC score. Accuracy scores of EIIP, Miyazawa energies, Micheletti potentials and hydrophobicity methods remained below 80%. When the results were examined in general, it was observed that the computational approaches were successful in predicting viral-host interactions between SARS-CoV-2 virus and human proteins.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104622
dc.identifier.issn0169-7439
dc.identifier.issn1873-3239
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3136-3341
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4938-4167
dc.identifier.pmid35879939
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135529185
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104622
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/62834
dc.identifier.volume228
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000841247700005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectProtein mapping
dc.subjectDeep learning
dc.subjectCovid-19
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2 virus
dc.titlePrediction of viral-host interactions of COVID-19 by computational methods
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar