Numerical investigation of treated brain glioma model using a two-stage successive over-relaxation method

dc.contributor.authorHussain, Abida
dc.contributor.authorMuthuvalu, Mohana Sundaram
dc.contributor.authorFaye, Ibrahima
dc.contributor.authorZafar, Mudasar
dc.contributor.authorİnç, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAfzal, Farkhanda
dc.contributor.authorIqbal, Muhammad Sajid
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:57:47Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractA brain tumor is a dynamic system in which cells develop rapidly and abnormally, as is the case with most cancers. Cancer develops in the brain or inside the skull when aberrant and odd cells proliferate in the brain. By depriving the healthy cells of leisure, nutrition, and oxygen, these aberrant cells eventually cause the healthy cells to perish. This article investigated the development of glioma cells in treating brain tumors. Mathematically, reaction-diffusion models have been developed for brain glioma growth to quantify the diffusion and proliferation of the tumor cells within brain tissues. This study presents the formulation the two-stage successive overrelaxation (TSSOR) algorithm based on the finite difference approximation for solving the treated brain glioma model to predict glioma cells in treating the brain tumor. Also, the performance of TSSOR method is compared to the Gauss-Seidel (GS) and two-stage Gauss-Seidel (TSGS) methods in terms of the number of iterations, the amount of time it takes to process the data, and the rate at which glioma cells grow the fastest. The implementation of the TSSOR, TSGS, and GS methods predicts the growth of tumor cells under the treatment protocol. The results show that the number of glioma cells decreased initially and then increased gradually by the next day. The computational complexity analysis is also used and concludes that the TSSOR method is faster compared to the TSGS and GS methods. According to the results of the treated glioma development model, the TSSOR approach reduced the number of iterations by between 8.0 and 71.95%. In terms of computational time, the TSSOR approach is around 1.18-76.34% faster than the TSGS and GS methods.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106429
dc.identifier.issn0010-4825
dc.identifier.issn1879-0534
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7777-1119
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4996-8373
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6929-8093
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5669-5839
dc.identifier.pmid36587570
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145257601
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106429
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/46594
dc.identifier.volume153
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000921187700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofComputers in Biology and Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectBrain tumor modeling
dc.subjectTwo -stage successive over -relaxation
dc.subjectTwo -stage Gauss -Seidel
dc.subjectGauss -Seidel
dc.subjectGlioma
dc.titleNumerical investigation of treated brain glioma model using a two-stage successive over-relaxation method
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar