Quetiapine is not associated with increase in prolactin secretion in contrast to haloperidol

dc.contributor.authorAtmaca, M
dc.contributor.authorKuloglu, M
dc.contributor.authorTezcan, E
dc.contributor.authorCanatan, H
dc.contributor.authorGecici, O
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:26:13Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground. Typical antipsychotic drugs frequently cause hyperprolactinemia and even galactorrhea. In addition, these side effects may result in noncompliance with antipsychotic treatment. Capacity to avoid hyperprolactinemia has been accepted as one atypical criterion. The aim of the present study was to compare effects of haloperidol, the most commonly used antipsychotic, and quetiapine, a novel antipsychotic agent used in Turkey, on serum prolactin (PRL) levels. Methods. The study consisted of 35 females diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4(th) ed. (DSM-IV). Thirty-five patients in a drug-free period for at least 2 weeks were included to randomized quetiapine (n = 18) and haloperidol (n = 17) treatment group. All patients were assessed by Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), and Extrapyramidal symptoms rating scale (ESRS). PRL levels were measured both at the beginning and at the sixth week of the study. Results. Both treatment groups exhibited significant improvements in clinical signs as evaluated by BPRS and PANSS. While there was no significant difference in PRL level between groups at the beginning of the study, control prolactin (PRL) levels were significantly lower in quetiapine compared to haloperidol group. While no quetiapine group patients exhibited galactorrhea, we observed that two patients from the haloperidol group had galactorrhea related to hyperprolactinemia. Conclusions. The present study revealed that quetiapine is not associated with increase in PRL secretion in contrast to the conventional antipsychotic haloperidol. (C) 2002 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0188-4409(02)00403-4
dc.identifier.endpage565
dc.identifier.issn0188-4409
dc.identifier.issn1873-5487
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid12505103
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0036868078
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage562
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0188-4409(02)00403-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/54738
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000179718200010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Medical Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectquetiapine
dc.subjecthaloperidol
dc.subjectprolactin
dc.subjecthyperprolactinemia
dc.titleQuetiapine is not associated with increase in prolactin secretion in contrast to haloperidol
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar