Comparison of different regression models to estimate fault location on hybrid power systems

dc.contributor.authorEkici, Sami
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorOzleyen, Umit
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:35:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractVarious pattern recognition methods have been suggested for estimating high-voltage alternating current transmission line fault location. However, insufficient studies have been conducted on the transmission lines connected to hybrid power generation systems such as wind and solar plants. In this study, the performance of different regression methods was investigated on a hybrid power system. Different faults with random distances on the transmission line were simulated and a fault database created by recording the current and voltage signals of these faults. After normalising this data in the pre-processing phase, it was passed to the digital signal processing stage. By repeating the experiments, 497 different faults were created. Fault types, fault resistances, and fault inception angles were changed randomly in order to obtain similar fault occurrence conditions as in real life by writing a Matlab code. In order to obtain distinctive features, the discrete wavelet transform was used. For training and validation of the dataset, Matlab Regression Learner App (RLA) was employed and the obtained results compared to select the best model. After significant fault simulation, Matern 5/2, a type of Gaussian progress regression model, showed more promising results compared to other RLA models.
dc.identifier.doi10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6213
dc.identifier.endpage4765
dc.identifier.issn1751-8687
dc.identifier.issn1751-8695
dc.identifier.issue20
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6760-2183
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1675-6836
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074598724
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage4756
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6213
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/57390
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000496496300025
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInst Engineering Technology-Iet
dc.relation.ispartofIet Generation Transmission & Distribution
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectregression analysis
dc.subjectfault location
dc.subjectdiscrete wavelet transforms
dc.subjectpattern recognition
dc.subjectfault diagnosis
dc.subjectpower transmission faults
dc.subjecthybrid power systems
dc.subjectwavelet transforms
dc.subjectpower transmission lines
dc.subjectfault database
dc.subjectcurrent voltage signals
dc.subjectpre-processing phase
dc.subjectdigital signal processing stage
dc.subject497 different faults
dc.subjectfault types
dc.subjectfault resistances
dc.subjectfault inception angles
dc.subjectsimilar fault occurrence conditions
dc.subjectMatlab Regression Learner App
dc.subjectsignificant fault simulation
dc.subjectGaussian progress regression model
dc.subjectdifferent regression models
dc.subjecthybrid power system
dc.subjectpattern recognition methods
dc.subjectcurrent transmission line fault location
dc.subjectinsufficient studies
dc.subjecthybrid power generation systems
dc.subjectdifferent regression methods
dc.titleComparison of different regression models to estimate fault location on hybrid power systems
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar