Carotid Artery Cut-Down in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: When and How

dc.contributor.authorDoyurgan, Onur
dc.contributor.authorAkdeniz, Osman
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Yigit
dc.contributor.authorAldudak, Bedri
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:06:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Vascular access used for pediatric cardiac catheterization is one of the most important factors that affects the success of the procedure. We aimed to compare the effect, success, and complications of cardiac catheterizations performed by carotid cut-down or femoral puncture in newborns or young infants. Methods: We included who underwent catheterization in our department between 28 January 2017 and 15 April 2021. These patients underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty, balloon coarctation angioplasty, ductal stenting, diagnostic procedures for aortic arch pathologies, and modified Blalock-Taussig in-shunt intervention. Patients were divided into two groups: femoral puncture (group = 1) and carotid cut-down (CC, group = 2). Results: Seventy-two catheterization procedures were performed in 64 patients; 32 (44.4%) were performed via the femoral approach and 40 (55.6%) were performed via the carotid approach. Sixteen (22.2%) procedures were diagnostic and 56 (77.8%) procedures were interventional. CC was performed in 13 (32.5%) patients with failed femoral intervention. Patients in the CC group had shorter durations of procedure, vascular access, and anesthesia, compared with the femoral access group (80.9 and 116.2 min, p = 0.001; 12.9 and 22.5 min, p = 0.001; 140.9 and 166.6 min, p = 0.001, respectively). Patients who underwent CC had fewer complications than did patients in the femoral access group (2.5% and 21.8%, respectively; p = 0.01); larger sheats were used in CC patients (p = 0.028). Conclusion: The carotid artery can be successfully used as a primary catheterization route, particularly in patients with small body weight and patients who require rapid vascular access, or stenting of the vertical duct.
dc.identifier.doi10.32604/chd.2022.018479
dc.identifier.endpage323
dc.identifier.issn1747-079X
dc.identifier.issn1747-0803
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0409-3588
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130365091
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage313
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32604/chd.2022.018479
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/49434
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000800265300006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTech Science Press
dc.relation.ispartofCongenital Heart Disease
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectCardiac catheterization
dc.subjectcarotid artery
dc.subjectcut-down
dc.subjectpediatric cardiology
dc.subjectsurgery
dc.titleCarotid Artery Cut-Down in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: When and How
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar