Flue Gas Emissions from the Burning of Asphaltite and Lignite in a Rotating Head Combustor with Secondary Air Delivery

dc.contributor.authorOner, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Sehmus
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description4th International Conference on Biorefinery-Toward Bioenergy -- DEC 03-05, 2013 -- Xiamen, PEOPLES R CHINA
dc.description.abstractIn this work, a rotating head combustor, which has been designed for burning the coking coals effectively, was deployed to burn a range of coals available in Turkey under agitation conditions with secondary air delivery. The coals were lignite (Tuncbilek, Turkey) and asphaltite with high swelling property known as coking coal (Sirnak, Turkey). The performance was investigated by determining the temperature distribution on the head, combustion efficiency, and the amount of unburned substances (such as C) in the ash, and flue gas emissions of O-2, CO, CO2, SO2, and NOx were measured during the experiments. The effect of operating conditions such as excess air ratio (EAR) and coal feeding rate was also investigated. The temperature distribution on the head was found to be high in the case of using the secondary air delivery and combustion efficiency was above 80% at the EAR of 1.3 and coal feeding rate of 9 kg/h when asphaltite was used as the fuel in the rotating head combustor. The comparison between asphaltite and lignite could lead to the conclusion that asphaltite provides slightly higher efficiency than lignite, and the difference is very small at the EAR of 1.3. When flue gas emissions are compared, it is seen that CO and SO2 emissions from asphaltite combustion are higher while CO2 and NOx emissions are lower than those derived from lignite combustion. For the combustion of both fuels, secondary air sent to the bed surface had a noticeable influence on combustion and emission characteristics via its effect on the combustion of volatility products and released gases from the bed surface. However, it should be more for lignite combustion in order to get better performance.
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/ef500909g
dc.identifier.endpage4516
dc.identifier.issn0887-0624
dc.identifier.issn1520-5029
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84904546224
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage4511
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1021/ef500909g
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/61361
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000339368500033
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmer Chemical Soc
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy & Fuels
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectCirculating Fluidized-Bed
dc.subjectCoal
dc.subjectCarbon
dc.titleFlue Gas Emissions from the Burning of Asphaltite and Lignite in a Rotating Head Combustor with Secondary Air Delivery
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar