Endometrial Vitamin D Receptor Expression by mRNA and Immunohistochemistry in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure and Unexplained Infertility

dc.contributor.authorYardim, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Onder
dc.contributor.authorErsahin, Aynur
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Nur Dokuzeylul
dc.contributor.authorYanar, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Nilufer
dc.contributor.authorKuloglu, Tuncay
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-08T07:13:43Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentFırat Üniveristesi
dc.description.abstractBackground Although not a major determinant of receptivity, underexpression of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) is associated with endometrial dysfunction. This study aimed to determine VDR expression in the endometrium of patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and unexplained infertility (UEI) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemistry. Methods A total of 75 patients (25 RIF, 25 UEI, and 25 fertile controls) were enrolled in the study. In the control group, only patients with early luteal phase histology according to Noyes' criteria were included to match the endometrial sampling timing of the RIF and UEI groups; patients with follicular and mid-luteal phase histology were excluded, and enrollment continued until 25 eligible patients were identified. Serum vitamin D (VD) levels were measured in all participants. Endometrial tissue was collected using a Pipelle cannula at the time of oocyte retrieval. VDR transcript variant 2 (VDR2) and 4 (VDR4) expression was analyzed using PCR. Endometrial tissue was subjected to VDR immunostaining. Results VDR2 expression in the RIF group (0.37 +/- 0.02 vs. 1.01 +/- 0.03, p < 0.001) and UEI group (0.28 +/- 0.01 vs. 1.01 +/- 0.03, p < 0.001) was significantly lower compared to the control group. VDR2 expression was similar in the RIF and UEI groups. VDR4 expression in the RIF group (0.46 +/- 0.02) was significantly lower than that in the UEI (1.16 +/- 0.07) and control (1.02 +/- 0.05) groups (p < 0.001 for each comparison). VDR4 expression in the UEI and control groups was similar. The histo-score values of the RIF (0.49 +/- 0.03) and UEI (0.35 +/- 0.03) groups were significantly lower than those of the control group (1.24 +/- 0.13) (p < 0.001 for both). In the RIF group, VDR2 was positively correlated with VD (r = 0.593, p = 0.002) and endometrial thickness (r = 0.627, p < 0.001). Conclusion Low serum vitamin D levels in patients with RIF and UEI were found concomitantly with low VDR expression in the endometrium. Further research is needed to determine whether VD supplementation and adjustment of serum VD concentrations modulate VDR expression and its effects on embryo implantation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s44411-026-00765-1
dc.identifier.endpage3803
dc.identifier.issn0006-9248
dc.identifier.issn1336-0345
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5444-9116
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105044808450
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage3793
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44411-026-00765-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/65552
dc.identifier.volume127
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001822441200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringernature
dc.relation.ispartofBratislava Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250903
dc.subjectVitamin D Receptor
dc.subjectEndometrium
dc.subjectImplantation Failure
dc.subjectUnexplained Infertility
dc.titleEndometrial Vitamin D Receptor Expression by mRNA and Immunohistochemistry in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure and Unexplained Infertility
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar