A survey of ixodid ticks feeding on cattle and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in the Black Sea region of Turkey

dc.contributor.authorAktas, Munir
dc.contributor.authorAltay, Kursat
dc.contributor.authorOzubek, Sezayi
dc.contributor.authorDumanli, Nazir
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:46:33Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe study reports the frequency of infestation and the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in feeding adult ticks detached from cattle in two climatic zones of the Black Sea region of Turkey. A total of 2160 adult ticks were collected during 2007-2008. Of these, 1062 were randomly selected, divided into 224 pools, and tested for the presence of bovine Theileria, Babesia, and Anaplasma species. Eleven tick species were recognized on cattle in the study. Hyalomma marginatum was widely disrubuted in the semi-arid bioclimatic zone, but few specimens were collected in the humid bioclimatic zone. The most prevalent tick species in the humid climatic zone was Ixodes ricinus. Infection rates were calculated as the maximum likelihood estimation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Overall, 4% (CI 2.87-5.44) of 224 tick pools were found to be positive for the pathoges by Reverse line blot. Maximum likelihood estimation of the infection rate varied among tick species, ranging from 2.68% (CI 0.16-12.68) in Haemaphysalis sulcata to 10.49% (CI 4.07-23.66) in Rhipicephalus bursa. The most prevalent tick-borne pathogen was Anaplasma phagocytophilum at 6.78% (CI 3.41-12.18) followed by A. centrale (6.56%, CI 0.42-31.47), Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp. (3.61%, CI 1.99-6.06), Babesia spp. (3.33%, CI 1.65-6.03), and T. buffeli/orientalis (2.71%, CI 0.73-7.18). Sequencing results indicated that Babesia spp. shared 99% to 100% similarity with the unnamed Babesia sp. Kashi 1 and 2, Babesia sp. Kayseri 1 and Babesia sp.CS58. Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp. were 98% and 100% identical to Ehrlichia canis and Ehrlichia sp. Omatjenne strain, respectively. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [106 O 416]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported financially by grant 106 O 416 from the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK).
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.01.035
dc.identifier.endpage571
dc.identifier.issn0304-4017
dc.identifier.issn1873-2550
dc.identifier.issue3.Nis
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5288-1239
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5231-2258
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3188-8757
dc.identifier.pmid22365338
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84862506233
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage567
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.01.035
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/61138
dc.identifier.volume187
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307323700033
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Parasitology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectTick
dc.subjectTick-borne pathogens
dc.subjectPCR
dc.subjectRLB
dc.titleA survey of ixodid ticks feeding on cattle and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in the Black Sea region of Turkey
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar