What is the best treatment for adult distal 1/3 humerus fractures? Best treatment for humerus fractures

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorGurger, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAtilgan, Numan
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:08:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: Adult humeral fractures that do not extend to the elbow joint can be seen in low-energy trauma in the elderly and high-energy trauma in the young. Fractures of the distal 1/3 of the humerus are treated with surgical and non-surgical methods. Our study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiological results of the distal 1/3 humerus fractures, which do not involve the joint, by comparing the conservative and surgical treatments and the surgical techniques used. Material and Methods: Thirty-five patients with adult distal 1/3 humeral fractures that did not extend to the joint between January 2010 and October 2014 were included in the study. The cases were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Nine of the cases were female and 26 were male. The mean age of the patients was 33,6. The articular range of motion (ROM) of cases was measured at an average of 118,8 degrees, and extension loss was measured at an average of 7,14 degrees. The average Mayo score of cases was measured at 87. Mono plaque osteosynthesis was applied to 20 of all cases (Group I), double plate osteosynthesis was applied to 11 (Group II), and conservative treatment was applied to 4 (Group III). A statistically significant difference between Group I and Group II was not been determined regarding union time, complication, Mayo Score, Cassebaum's rating, ROM, and extension loss. According to surgical approaches applied to patients (lateral-posterior), while no statistical difference was determined regarding complications, union time, and ROM, a significant difference was determined regarding Mayo Score and extension loss. According to different determination methods, a statistical difference was not been determined regarding complications, ROM, extension loss, Mayo Score and union time. Discussion: We recommend surgery with a lateral approach to preserve the extensor mechanism in fractures of the distal 1/3 of the humerus.
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/ACAM.21605
dc.identifier.endpage690
dc.identifier.issn2667-663X
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7510-7203
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1366-9163
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2348-8339
dc.identifier.startpage686
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/ACAM.21605
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/50165
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001050540900005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBayrakol Medical Publisher
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectHumerus Distal Fractures
dc.subjectSurgical Treatment
dc.subjectConservative Treatment
dc.subjectMayo Score
dc.titleWhat is the best treatment for adult distal 1/3 humerus fractures? Best treatment for humerus fractures
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar