A prospective randomized study of three different methods of episiotomy repair

dc.contributor.authorUslu, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorOzekici, U.
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, M.
dc.contributor.authorBerkman, S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:16:22Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstract[Abstract Not Available]
dc.identifier.endpage242
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0026731646
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/44233
dc.identifier.volume55
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.ispartofIstanbul Tip Fakultesi Mecmuasi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260511
dc.subjectpolyglycolic acid; article; catgut; clinical trial; controlled study; disability; episiotomy; female; human; major clinical study; pain; pharmacology; puerperium; randomized controlled trial; silk; surgical technique
dc.titleA prospective randomized study of three different methods of episiotomy repair
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar