Clinical Management Strategies of Cardiologists in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Türkiye

dc.contributor.authorKocabas, Umut
dc.contributor.authorOzcalik, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKivrak, Tarik
dc.contributor.authorAltin, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Ugur Onsel
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:07:52Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Integrating heart failure (HF) guideline recommendations into clinical practice takes time and is often suboptimal in real-life settings. Physician-related factors may be significant barriers to the adoption of these guidelines. This survey aims to assess the current opinions of cardiologists practicing in T & uuml;rkiye regarding the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: The survey comprised 22 questions and was published on the SurveyMonkey platform. Results: A total of 177 cardiologists (mean age: 39.5 years; 73.3% male) participated in the survey. Of these, 38.7% worked in a training and research hospital, and 10.2% were specialists in HF. The threshold EF value to define HFrEF was <= 40% for 80.1% of the cardiologists. While 52.6% of physicians considered angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) treatment the most effective medication for HF, 62.7% would initiate HF treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) instead of ARNi due to reimbursement and cost issues. More than half of the cardiologists (52.3%) stated that adding another class of HF medication is more important than up-titrating those already prescribed. Although 69.5% of the study participants indicated prescribing all four classes of HF medications during the initial hospitalization is feasible, most cardiologists preferred a sequential approach starting with ACEi/ARNi, followed by beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Conclusion: This survey highlights significant discrepancies between guideline recommendations and the real-life clinical practice of cardiologists in T & uuml;rkiye. These results suggest that there is a need for organized action by healthcare providers to improve the implementation of guideline recommendations.
dc.identifier.doi10.5543/tkda.2024.32050
dc.identifier.issn1016-5169
dc.identifier.issn1308-4488
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pmid39620289
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211418874
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.trdizinid1335188
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2024.32050
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1335188
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/49826
dc.identifier.volume52
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001434634200006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKare Publ
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectGuideline
dc.subjectheart failure
dc.subjectrecommendation
dc.subjecttreatment
dc.titleClinical Management Strategies of Cardiologists in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Türkiye
dc.title.alternativeTürkiye’de Azalmış Ejeksiyon Fraksiyonlu Kalp Yetersizliğinde Kardiyologların Klinik Yönetim Stratejileri
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar