Author's reply

dc.contributor.authorKirkil, Cüneyt
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:13:02Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstract[Abstract Not Available]
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tjg.2015.0221
dc.identifier.endpage90
dc.identifier.issn1300-4948
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid25845038
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84922553171
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage89
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2015.0221
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/42816
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Society of Gastroenterology
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Gastroenterology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260511
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents; Appendicitis; Female; Humans; Male; antiinfective agent; acute appendicitis; appendectomy; conservative treatment; cost benefit analysis; follow up; hospital charge; hospital cost; human; Letter; noncomplicated acute appendicitis; treatment outcome; appendicitis; female; male
dc.titleAuthor's reply
dc.typeLetter

Dosyalar