Comparison of a sMBR and a CASP system for wastewater reclamation and re-use
| dc.contributor.author | Hasar, H | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kinaci, C | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:02:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | The performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (sMBR) for municipal wastewater reclamation and re-use was compared with that of a current classic activated sludge process (CASP). The average chemical oxygen demand (COO) of CASP effluent was 75 mg/l, while the average COD of sMBR filtrate was 15 mg/l. In general, COD removal was above 98%. However, the best results were obtained at a sludge rentention time (SRT) of 50 days. The total phosphorus (TP) content of the filtrate decreased to a level <1 mg/l under aerobic conditions in which aeration occurred continuously. It was shown that the filtrate TIP and orthoposphate (Orto-P) concentrations increased dramatically during the periods of intermittent aeration because phosphorus is released under anoxic conditions. In the CASP effluent, the average TP and Orto-P were 7.9 mg/l and 7.1 mg/l, respectively. The filtrate was free of suspended solids (SS) and total coliform bacteria. The effluent SS in the CASP was 40 mg/l. The turbidity removal in the sMBR reached almost 99%, i.e. generally less than 1 NTU, while the average turbidity of the CASP effluent was almost 15 NTU. The removal of ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) in the sMBR was almost 99.8%. In addition, the nitrate concentration in the filtrate decreased to 2.4 mg/l under both aerobic & anoxic conditions. It was shown that both nitrification and denitrification could be successfully reduced through intermittent aeration. Average total Kjeldehl nitrogen (TKN) and NH4+-N in the CASP effluent were 30.2 mg/l and 20 mg/l, respectively, i.e. the nitrification efficiency was 42.9%, and the denitrification value was not available. When these results are compared with those in the CASP it indicated that the sMBR could be successfully used for reclamation and re-use of municipal wastewater. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S0015-1882(04)00112-0 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 39 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0015-1882 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1873-7218 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-8207-8669 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-1775-3466 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-1542317604 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 35 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-1882(04)00112-0 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/48086 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 41 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000189281200005 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Ma Healthcare Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Filtration + Separation | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Activated-Sludge Process | |
| dc.subject | Membrane Bioreactor | |
| dc.subject | Filtration | |
| dc.subject | Separation | |
| dc.subject | Industrial | |
| dc.subject | Aeration | |
| dc.title | Comparison of a sMBR and a CASP system for wastewater reclamation and re-use | |
| dc.type | Article |







