Surgical approaches in patients with empyema: Clinical evaluation
| dc.contributor.author | Muharrem, Cakmak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Evrim, Gul | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:09:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Aim: Surgical treatment procedures for empyema are tube thoracostomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and thoracotomy. In this study, we aimed to share the characteristics and treatment outcomes of the patients with empyema treated with surgery. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients were divided into 3 groups as patients who underwent tube thoracostomy (Group 1), VATS (Group 2), and thoracotomy (Group 3). Factors affecting the application of VATS-thoracotomy instead of tube thoracostomy and the application of thoracotomy instead of VATS were identified. The results were analyzed by the Fisher's exact test. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: In Group 1 (n: 94), gram stain and culture results were positive in five (5%) patients, whereas negative results were found in 89 (95%). Loculation existed in five (5%) patients. In Group 2 (n: 6), in 2 patients (33%), gram stain and cultures were positive, while in 4 (67%) patients, they were negative. Loculation was present in 2 patients (33%). In Group 3 (n: 56), gram stain and cultures were positive in 19 (34%) patients, while they were negative in 37 patients (66%). Loculation existed in 53 patients (95%). The presence of positive gram stain and culture results, loculations, and purulent aspiration in thoracentesis were found to be more effective in preferring VATS-thoracotomy instead of tube thoracostomy. The presence of loculations only was found to be more effective in performing thoracotomy instead of VATS (p<0.05). Discussion: In cases where gram stain and culture are positive, and loculation and purulent aspiration exist, VATS and thoracotomy should be preferred. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4328/ACAM.20056 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 296 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2667-663X | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 291 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4328/ACAM.20056 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/50369 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 11 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000572683500010 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Bayrakol Medical Publisher | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Empyema | |
| dc.subject | Thoracoscopy | |
| dc.subject | Thoracostomy | |
| dc.subject | Thoracotomy | |
| dc.title | Surgical approaches in patients with empyema: Clinical evaluation | |
| dc.type | Article |







