3D-architecture and Neogene evolution of the Malatya Basin: Inferences for the kinematics of the Malatya and Ovacik fault zones

dc.contributor.authorKaymakci, Nuretdin
dc.contributor.authorInceoez, Murat
dc.contributor.authorErtepinar, Pinar
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe 3D-architecture of the Malatya Basin was studied using remote sensing, seismic interpretation, and palaeostress analysis in the context of the Malatya-Ovacik fault zone. The results indicate that the Ovacik and Malatya fault zones are not different segments of a single 'so called' Malatya-Ovacik fault zone; rather, they are two different fault zones that have operated independently. In addition, the Ovacik fault zone is delimited in the west by the Malatya fault zone, which extends farther north from the point of supposed junction. Maximum individual deflection of streams along the Ovacik fault zone is about 9.3 km, and summation of all stream deflections along different segments of the Ovacik fault zone indicates that sinistral displacement of the Ovacik fault zone has been not more than 20 km following development of the drainage system in the region. Evidence for three different deformation phases were recognized in the Malatya Basin. Deformation phase 1 was characterized by NW - SE-directed extension and operated in the Early to Middle Miocene interval. Deformation phase 2 was characterized by WNW-ESE-directed compression and a vertical sigma(2) which indicates transcurrent tectonics. It operated in the Late Miocene to Middle Pliocene. Deformation phase 3 was characterized by NNE-SSW-directed compression, and vertical stress is interchanged with sigma(2) and sigma(3); this is interpreted as due to near equal magnitudes of these stresses, resulting in stress permutation and interchange of intermediate and minor stress. Deformation phase 3 commenced in the Late Pliocene and has been active since then. The infill of the Malatya Basin has wedge-like geometry in E - W and N - S directions and the basin fed detritus mainly from its eastern margin. During field studies in the basin, a number of inverted normal faults were encountered; these apparently developed as growth faults in the Early to Middle Miocene time interval and then were reactivated or inverted during post-Middle Miocene compressional phases.
dc.identifier.endpage154
dc.identifier.issn1300-0985
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7618-0226
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33746448349
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage123
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/48207
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000238974200002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Earth Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectMalatya Basin
dc.subjectMalatya fault zone
dc.subjectOvacik fault zone
dc.subjectpalaeostress
dc.subjectreactivation
dc.subjectinversion
dc.title3D-architecture and Neogene evolution of the Malatya Basin: Inferences for the kinematics of the Malatya and Ovacik fault zones
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar