Predicting HFA 30-2 Visual Fields with Deep Learning from Multimodal OCT-Fundus Feature Fusion and Structure-Function Discordance Analysis

dc.contributor.authorFirat, Ilknur Tuncer
dc.contributor.authorFirat, Murat
dc.contributor.authorErbali, Haci
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Taner
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractGlaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss. During clinical follow-up, visual field (VF) tests (Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2) assesses functional loss, while optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus imaging provide structural information. However, VF measurement can be subjective, exhibit test-retest variability, and sometimes exhibit structure-function discordance (SFD). Therefore, predicting VF values from structural images may support clinical decision-making. To estimate Humphrey 30-2 measures (mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and point-wise threshold sensitivity (TS)) in glaucoma/ocular hypertension (OHT) using a ViT-B/32-based feature-fusion approach on OCT and fundus images, and to examine the effect of SFD via sensitivity analysis. Visual features were extracted from color optic disc photographs, red-free fundus images, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness map, and circular RNFL plots using Vision Transformer (ViT-B/32)-based models. These features were combined with demographic and clinical data to form a multimodal artificial intelligence model. Global VF indices (MD, PSD) were estimated with probabilistic regression that accounts for uncertainty, and point-wise TS values were predicted using a location-aware network. In a separate analysis, eyes exhibiting SFD were identified and excluded to assess model performance under OCT-VF concordance. Mean absolute errors (MAE) were 2.26, 1.42, and 2.96 dB for MD, PSD, and mean TS, respectively, and the proportions within +/- 2 dB were 59.65%, 75.44%, and 57.90%. After excluding SFD eyes, MAEs decreased to 1.82, 1.30, and 2.12 dB for MD, PSD, and mean TS, respectively; the proportions within +/- 2 dB increased to 66.7%, 76.5% and 62.7%, respectively. These findings indicate that discordance affects performance and that predictions are more reliable in clinically concordant cases. ViT-B/32-based deep feature fusion offers clinically meaningful accuracy for predicting VF metrics from multimodal structural images. SFD was frequently detected among the lowest-performing cases, and this possibility should be considered when interpreting low-performing outputs.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10278-025-01798-8
dc.identifier.issn2948-2925
dc.identifier.issn2948-2933
dc.identifier.pmid41559508
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105028115970
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01798-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/44440
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001665567700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectVisual Field
dc.subjectHumphrey 30-2
dc.subjectOptical Coherence Tomography
dc.subjectVision Transformer
dc.subjectStructure-function Discordance
dc.titlePredicting HFA 30-2 Visual Fields with Deep Learning from Multimodal OCT-Fundus Feature Fusion and Structure-Function Discordance Analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar