Comparative Analysis of the Academic Performance of Research Universities in Türkiye Using MCDM Techniques

dc.contributor.authorKarahan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKarahan, Merve Sinem
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:08:17Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractWith the increase in the number of universities in recent years, university rankings, which evaluate the success and development of universities, have become significantly important. These rankings are determined by various parameters and their corresponding weights, established through an inter-university ranking system based on verifiable data used for academic evaluation. The rapid rise of universities in global rankings is driven by growing academic, student, and parent interest. However, these rankings often fail to reflect the true desires of students and do not always adequately measure academic productivity. This study aims to determine the steps Turkish universities should take to improve their standing in these ranking systems, using both global and national data. In the research, the academic performance of 20 research universities in T & uuml;rkiye in 2022 was evaluated and compared based on the weight of 8 criteria. The criterion weights were calculated using the Entropy method, and performance rankings were calculated using the PROMETHEE method. The results were presented in a table showing the performance rankings of these universities across the 8 criteria, and the competitive priorities of the universities were interpreted in relation to their performances. The study found that, among the eight criteria determining the performance of research universities in T & uuml;rkiye, the criterion with the highest weight was the number of faculty members per student, while the criterion with the lowest weight was the number of citations. The academic performance rankings of the 20 Turkish research universities were as follows: Hacettepe, Gazi, Ege, & Idot;stanbul, Ankara, Cerrahpa & scedil;a, & Idot;T & Uuml;, Gebze Teknik, METU, Dokuz Eyl & uuml;l, KT & Uuml;, Atat & uuml;rk, & Idot;zmir Y & uuml;ksek Teknoloji, Bo & gbreve;azigi, Marmara, F & imath;rat, Erciyes, Y & imath;ld & imath;z Teknik, & Ccedil;ukurova, and Uluda & gbreve; universities.
dc.identifier.doi10.53478/yuksekogretim.1464533
dc.identifier.endpage208
dc.identifier.issn2146-796X
dc.identifier.issn2146-7978
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0402-0020
dc.identifier.startpage195
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1464533
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/50004
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001505098000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTuba-Turkish Acad Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofYuksekogretim Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectAcademic Performance
dc.subjectHigher Education
dc.subjectScientific Productivity
dc.subjectUniversity Rankings
dc.titleComparative Analysis of the Academic Performance of Research Universities in Türkiye Using MCDM Techniques
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar