Tuberculous and brucellosis meningitis differential diagnosis

dc.contributor.authorErdem, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorSenbayrak, Seniha
dc.contributor.authorGencer, Serap
dc.contributor.authorHasbun, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorKarahocagil, Mustafa Kasim
dc.contributor.authorSengoz, Gonul
dc.contributor.authorGorenek, Levent
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:48:28Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Thwaites and Lancet scoring systems have been used in the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). However, brucellar meningoencephalitis (BME) has similar characteristics with TBM. The ultimate aim of this study is to infer data to see if BME should be included in the differential diagnosis of TBM when these two systems suggest the presence of TBM. Method: BME and TBM patients from 35 tertiary hospitals were included in this study. Overall 294 adult patients with BME and 190 patients with TBM were enrolled. All patients involved in the study had microbiological confirmation for either TBM or BME. Finally, the Thwaites and Lancet scoring systems were assessed in both groups. Results: The Thwaites scoring system more frequently predicted BME cases (n = 292, 99.3%) compared to the TBM group (n = 182, 95.8%) (P = 0.017). According to the Lancet scoring system, the mean scores for BME and TBM were 9.43 +/- 1.71 and 11.45 +/- 3.01, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, TBM cases were classified into probable category more significantly compared to BME cases, and BME cases were categorized into the possible category more frequently. Conclusions: When the Thwaites or Lancet scoring systems indicate TBM, brucellar etiology should also be taken into consideration particularly in endemic countries. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tmaid.2015.02.008
dc.identifier.endpage191
dc.identifier.issn1477-8939
dc.identifier.issn1873-0442
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0008-2877-8128
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1182-7164
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6475-3894
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5171-7306
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2189-9823
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9983-0308
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2569-7601
dc.identifier.pmid25801665
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84926407993
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage185
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2015.02.008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/61440
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000353741200014
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofTravel Medicine and Infectious Disease
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectBrucellosis
dc.subjectTuberculosis
dc.subjectMeningitis
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.titleTuberculous and brucellosis meningitis differential diagnosis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar