Our clinical results in the management of proximal humeral fractures
| dc.contributor.author | Eriten, Semih | |
| dc.contributor.author | Demir, Sukru | |
| dc.contributor.author | Emeli, Adem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Altunkılıç, Tarık | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sevimli, Doç. Dr. Reşit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Önce, Gökhan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T15:36:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiological and functional results of patients treated with different methodsin our clinic for proximal humerus fracture.Material and Methods: A total of 106 patients with a diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture, who were scheduled for treatment,received management and followed up periodically after discharge were included. Patient files, X-RAY radiographs in the PACSsystem, surgical notes and outpatient epicrisis were used. Functional results were evaluated according to Constant shoulder scoreat the last visit.Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.6 years (17-94). The mean follow-up period was 11.3 months (6-40 months). 55 (51.9%)had Type II, 35 (33%) had Type III and 16 (15.1%) had Type IV proximal end humeral fractures. As a result of the evaluation performedat the last follow-up of the patients, Constant-Murley’s total score was 64.50 out of 100 (31-88). Score distribution according to Neerclassification of patients; A Constant-Murley score median with a Neer Type II fracture was 74.00 (36-88), a Constant-Murley Score medianwith a Neer Type III fracture was 61.00 (31-78), and a Constant-Murley score median with a Neer Type IV fracture was 44.50 (33-70).Conclusion: When the fracture type and functional outcome of the patients were compared, functional outcome decreased as thefracture type increased. Young patients had better functional results than older patients. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.816 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 68 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2636-7688 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 63 | |
| dc.identifier.trdizinid | 362825 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.816 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/362825 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/35189 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 27 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Medical Research | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.relation.tubitak | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/TUBITAK// | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_TR-Dizin_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Genel ve Dahili Tıp | |
| dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri | |
| dc.subject | Cerrahi | |
| dc.subject | Ortopedi | |
| dc.title | Our clinical results in the management of proximal humeral fractures | |
| dc.type | Article |







