Carotid Body Tumor: Clinical Features

dc.contributor.authorKaygusuz, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorKarlidag, Turgut
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Erol
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Sinasi
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Koray
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:16:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAlthough carotid body tumor (CBT) is a rare neoplasm, it should always be considered in differential diagnosis of lateral neck masses. We shared the 10 years of CBT experience in our clinic and started a discussion on CBT with literature support. A total of 21 patients with CBT diagnosis in Firat University Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology Clinic, participated in the study. Patients were evaluated based on demographical data and particularities of the tumor. Participant patients were 19 women and 2 men, and their ages were between 21 and 79 (mean age 54.06 +/- 12.48). The most frequent reason for the patients to apply to the hospital was painless swelling in the neck (76.2%). Tumor was located in the right side of the neck in 10 patients (47.6%), and in the left side of the neck in 11 (52.4%). Twenty patients (95.2%) had undergone computerized tomography angiography. Surgical treatment was applied to 19 patients (90.5%) and the tumor was totally excised. According to Shamblin classification, 15 of the tumors of these patients were class II (78.9%) and 4 were class III (21.1%). In 1 patient (5.3%), postoperative contusion infection that recovered after medical treatment was observed; in 2 patients (10.5%), n. vagus injury was observed because of tumor's pervasion of n. vagus; and in 1 of these patients vocal cord paralysis was developed and this patient was later taken into thyroplasty surgery. Two patients (10.5%) suffered n. hypoglossus injury, 1 of these recovered within 3 months postoperative and the other developed n. hypoglossus palsy. The size and extension of the tumor should be determined by pre-operative imaging for the correct planning of surgical procedure. It should be taken into consideration that despite advanced surgical techniques, the rate of postoperative cranial nerve damage is still high.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000002003
dc.identifier.endpageE589
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2748-7309
dc.identifier.pmid26468830
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84945196018
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpageE586
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/52386
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001289269500013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectCarotid body tumor
dc.subjectchemodectoma
dc.subjectlateral neck mass
dc.titleCarotid Body Tumor: Clinical Features
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar