Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Retreated Roots After Retreatment Using Self-Adjusting File, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, or Laser

dc.contributor.authorKamalak, Aliye
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ali
dc.contributor.authorDoganay, Ezgi
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Cangul
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, Merve
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:40:43Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Additional cleaning techniques and devices are required to remove maximum amount of residual filling material, which might limit disinfection of root canal system during retreatment. This study aimed to compare fracture resistance of roots when self-adjusting file (SAF), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG), or neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers are applied following the use of retreatment files in endodontics. Materials and methods: A total of 117 human mandibular canine teeth of similar dimensions were selected and divided into nine groups (n=13). Aside from control, instrumented, and only-prepared groups, 91 teeth were remaining, of which 13 were assigned to the only-filling group and final 78 to retreatment, thus R-Endo file, R-Endo+SAF, R-Endo+PUI, R-Endo+Er:YAG laser, R-Endo+Nd:YAG laser, and R-Endo+PIPS. Results: The fracture strengths of the retreatment groups were lower than control, instrumented, and only-filling groups (p<0.05). There was no difference between the R-Endo group and additional retreatment procedure groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: Further cleaning methods using SAF, PIPS, Er:YAG laser, Nd:YAG laser, or PUI did not decrease the fracture resistance when compared with the R-Endo group.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK [114S052]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK (Grant No. 114S052).
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2016.4121
dc.identifier.endpage472
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.issn1557-8550
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4890-1062
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8990-4847
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2835-767X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3353-3260
dc.identifier.pmid27598303
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84990070031
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage467
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4121
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/45530
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000385654100006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofPhotomedicine and Laser Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectRotary Niti Instruments
dc.subjectRemoving Gutta-Percha
dc.subjectFilling Materials
dc.subjectCanal Dentin
dc.subjectEfficacy
dc.subjectSolvents
dc.subjectTeeth
dc.titleFracture Resistance of Endodontically Retreated Roots After Retreatment Using Self-Adjusting File, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, or Laser
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar