CONUT Score as a Potential Nutritional Index for Predicting Mortality among Septic Patients

dc.contributor.authorAltuntas, Gulsum
dc.contributor.authorTimurkaan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAksu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Oguzhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-08T07:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFırat Üniveristesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: In sepsis patients, impairment of the immune system can damage the ability of fighting infection, and leads to poor outcomes. The aim of our study is to evaluate the role of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in predicting mortality in sepsis patients, in comparison with other nutritional assessment tools and disease severity scoring systems in intensive care units. Method: In this retrospective single-centre observational study patients aged ≥18 years who were followed up in intensive care units with a diagnosis of sepsis between January 2016 and October 2024 were included. Data was obtained from files and the hospital’s electronic database. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), and CONUT scores were recorded. Logistic regression analysis and multivariate modeling were performed to calculate the risk of mortality. The accuracy of APACHE II, SOFA, NRS 2002, and CONUT scores in predicting mortality was compared by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The study included 926 patients. In logistic regression analysis, SOFA, CONUT, APACHE II, and NRS 2002 Scores were independent risk factors. The CONUT score (AUC: 0.974), SOFA score (AUC: 0.964) and APACHE II score (AUC: 0.938) showed higher diagnostic accuracy than the NRS 2002 score (AUC: 0.814). There was no significant difference between CONUT and SOFA scores (p=0.37; z=1.48). CONUT score had a higher AUC than APACHE II (p<0.05; z=4.15). Conclusion: The CONUT score offers a practical alternative to clinicians, especially in assessing nutritional status and predicting mortality in patients with sepsis, due to its easy applicability and reliance on biochemical parameters. © This work is licensed by “Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-4.0 International (CC)”.
dc.identifier.doi10.54875/jarss.2025.90582
dc.identifier.endpage270
dc.identifier.issn1300-0578
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105043914239
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage262
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2025.90582
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/65005
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAnestezi Dergisi
dc.relation.ispartofAnestezi Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250903
dc.subjectConut Score
dc.subjectMalnutrition
dc.subjectMortality
dc.subjectNrs 2002 Score
dc.subjectSepsis
dc.titleCONUT Score as a Potential Nutritional Index for Predicting Mortality among Septic Patients
dc.title.alternativeSeptik Hastalarda Mortaliteyi Öngörmede Potansiyel Bir Nutrisyonel İndeks Olarak CONUT Skoru
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar