Micro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives

dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Firat
dc.contributor.authorErsoz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Seyit Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorHatunoglu, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Siddik
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:48:51Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with direct and different indirect bonding techniques and adhesives using micro-computed tomography. A total of 30 human maxillary premolars were randomly separated into five groups with six teeth in each group. In group I, teeth were bonded directly with Transbond XT (3M Unitek). In group II, group III, group IV, and group V, teeth were bonded through an indirect technique with Custom I.Q. (Reliance Orthodontic Products), Sondhi Rapid-Set (3M Unitek), RMbond (RMO), and Transbond IDB (3M Unitek), respectively, following the manufacturer's instructions. Micro-CT system model 1172 of Skyscan (Kontich, Belgium) was used to scan all samples. NRecon (Skyscan) version 1.6, CT-Analyser V.1.11 (Skyscan), and TView (SkyScan, Bvba) software programs were used for microleakage evaluation. Microleakage values between the test groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for within-group comparisons. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. According to the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test, there were no significant differences among the tested groups, with regard to volume and percentage (microleakage/region of interest x 100) of microleakage values (P < 0.05). The Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that coronal microleakage volume and percentage values significantly differed for RMbond and Transbond IDB groups. In the study, only ceramic brackets were used and microleakage into mini gaps did not show up on the micro-CT image because 50% silver nitrate solution could not penetrate into mini gaps which are smaller than silver nitrate particles. Use of direct and indirect bonding techniques with different adhesives did not significantly affect the amount of microleakage.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjv023
dc.identifier.endpage169
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid25855655
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84963974251
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage163
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/61560
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374414300007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodontics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectMetal Brackets
dc.subjectComputed Tomography
dc.subjectMarginal Leakage
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectLight
dc.subjectRestorations
dc.subjectPlacement
dc.subjectComposite
dc.subjectSystems
dc.subjectBovine
dc.titleMicro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar