Analysis of the bond strength between conventional, putty or resin-modified calcium silicate cement and bulk fill composites

dc.contributor.authorIpek, I.
dc.contributor.authorEskibaglar, B. Karaagac
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, S.
dc.contributor.authorAtas, O.
dc.contributor.authorUnal, M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three different calcium silicate-based cements (CBCs) with two different bulk-fill composite resins (CRs). Methods: Plexiglas moulds with a diameter of 4 mm and a thickness of 2 mm were prepared (n = 60). The Biodentine, NeoPutty and MTA Cem LC samples were randomly divided into two subgroups containing 10 samples each. Surfaces of samples were air dried and Single Bond universal adhesive was applied. Cylindrical plastic capsules of 4 mm height and 2 mm inner diameter belonging to Filtek Bulk-fill and EverX Posterior CRs were centred on coating material and polymerized for 20 s. After shear bond strength (SBS) testing, all samples were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to identify failure patterns. Three samples, one from each group, were prepared to evaluate chemical composition of CBCs and examined with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy for surface elemental analysis. Results: The values obtained from the tests were evaluated as statistically significant (P < 0.05). After SBS testing, the difference between all CBCs was statistically significant in both CRs. Conclusion: According to the findings in this study, it was concluded that MTA Cem LC had highest SBS values in both CRs. (c) 2023 Australian Dental Association.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Project Fund Firat University [DHF.22.03]
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank to the Scientific Research Project Fund Firat University. This study was supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund Firat University [grant number DHF.22.03].
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/adj.12977
dc.identifier.endpage272
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421
dc.identifier.issn1834-7819
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6621-3365
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0059-3603
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0925-4328
dc.identifier.pmid37665246
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169670808
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage265
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12977
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/58428
dc.identifier.volume68
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001061062000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectBulk fill composite
dc.subjectfailure type
dc.subjectsem
dc.subjectshear bond strength
dc.subjecttricalcium silicate
dc.titleAnalysis of the bond strength between conventional, putty or resin-modified calcium silicate cement and bulk fill composites
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar