Emergent endovascular treatment versus medical treatment for acute large vessel occlusions with nondisabling symptoms

dc.contributor.authorOnalan, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorGurkas, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorBalgetir, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorAytac, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorAkpinar, Cetin Kursad
dc.contributor.authorCetin, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorGenc, Sule Kavak
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:21:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness and safety of medical treatment (MT) versus endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute large vessel occlusion patients with mild nondisabling stroke symptoms. Methods: This study is a multicenter observational study in which data from patients at three stroke centers were prospectively obtained and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were included if they arrived for treatment within 6 h of stroke onset or last known well time and had a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of <= 5. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), discharge NIHSS score, 90-day all-cause mortality and length of stay. Clinical outcomes were compared through a multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for age, treatment type admission and discharge NIHSS score, admission Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) score and length of stay. Results: Of the 82 patients included in the study, 42 were in the EVT group and 40 were in the MT group. The groups were similar in age (MT:66, EVT:64 age; p = .62), gender (MT:55%, EVT:54.8%; male) admission NIHSS score (MT:2, EVT:3 points; p = .26), ASPECT score (MT:10, EVT:9; p = .15). While discharge NIHSS score was found to be statistically significant between the groups (MT:1, EVT:2; p = .04). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of 90-day mRS scores (MT:1, EVT:1, p = .86) and mortality rates (MT:4, EVT:4; p = .94). In unadjusted analysis, sICH rates were similar between the MT and EVT groups (MT 5%, EVT 7.1%, p = .52). Neurological intensive care unit length of stay (MT:5 days, EVT:2 days p < .001), inpatient clinic length of stay (MT:3, EVT:2 days p = .041), and total length of stay (MT:9 days, EVT:4 days p < .001) were significantly longer in the MT group. Conclusions: Our multicenter study demonstrated that MT with blood pressure augmentation and anticoagulation at hyperacute stage is an alternative option for emergency large vessel occlusion patients with nondisabling mild stroke symptoms.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15910199241286551
dc.identifier.endpage832
dc.identifier.issn1591-0199
dc.identifier.issn2385-2011
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9939-2678
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9512-1048
dc.identifier.pmid39360421
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85206085460
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage827
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241286551
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/54000
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001331007100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInterventional Neuroradiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectLarge vessel occlusion
dc.subjectinduced hypertension
dc.subjectanticoagulant treatment
dc.subjectmild stroke
dc.subjectnondisabling stroke
dc.titleEmergent endovascular treatment versus medical treatment for acute large vessel occlusions with nondisabling symptoms
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar