Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele

dc.contributor.authorOrhan, I
dc.contributor.authorOnur, R
dc.contributor.authorSemerciöz, A
dc.contributor.authorFirdolas, F
dc.contributor.authorArdicoglu, A
dc.contributor.authorKöksal, IT
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:34:32Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractWe reviewed records from patients who underwent two different microsurgical varicocelectomy methods: 147 (high inguinal (MHIV) and 65 sub-ingruinal (MSIV) microsurgery) to compare the therapeutic activity and complications. Patients who had 2 different microsurgical varicocelectomies were compared according to preoperative connected vein, number of designated arteries, postoperative semen and improvement degree in hormone parameters, increased ratio related with pregnancy and complications. The ratio of improvement of postoperative semen parameters in patients where MHIV and MSIV were performed was, 42% and 38% (p > 0.05). Pregnancy was achieved in MHIV at a ratio of 41% (34/82) and 33% (22/65) in MSIV (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference according to mean operation periods, the vein connected between the groups. The number of testicular arteries were significantly higher than the ones in MHIV (p < 0.01). However, as a postoperative complication, hydrocele was not seen in any of the patients, while relapses occurred in 1 MHIV and 2 MSIV patients. MHIV and MSIV techniques are effective methods to treat varicocele. However, the excess number of connected veins due to the anatomic feature of MSIV increases the possibility of relapses and the technical difficulty during surgical intervention.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01485010590919648
dc.identifier.endpage220
dc.identifier.issn0148-5016
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8688-4772
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6235-0389
dc.identifier.pmid16025860
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-18544371530
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage213
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01485010590919648
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/44494
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000228921600007
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Andrology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectinguinal
dc.subjectmale infertility
dc.subjectmicrosurgery
dc.subjectsub-inguinal
dc.subjectvaricocele
dc.titleComparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar