Prolidase Could Act as a Diagnosis and Treatment Mediator in Lung Fibrosis

dc.contributor.authorTurkbeyler, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Tuncer
dc.contributor.authorPehlivan, Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Davut Sinan
dc.contributor.authorCeribasi, Ali Osman
dc.contributor.authorOrkmez, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorOnat, Ahmet Mesut
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:46:41Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic lung disease with unknown etiology and pathogenesis. With high mortality risks, most of the IPF cases emerged after a damage of alveolar epithelium, where this situation stimulates the over expression of matrix components. Inflammatory process observed as a reaction to emerged damage. Prolidase as an iminodipeptidase significantly increased during the development of fibrosis. The aim of this study is to measure prolidase activity as a marker of treatment and diagnosis in an experimental lung fibrosis animal model. Thirty male Wistar rats randomly divided into three experimental groups, with ten rats in each group. Group 1, control group; group 2, bleomycin (BLM)-induced lung fibrosis group, and group 3, BLM-induced lung fibrosis treated with palosuran (urotensin-II receptor antagonist). For histopathology, the middle lobes of right lungs were embedded in paraffin, followed by fixation in 10 % buffered formalin, and evaluation of IPF was performed using the Ashcroft scoring method. Prolidase activity was determined by a photometric method based on the measurement of proline levels produced by prolidase. The fibrosis scores and the prolidase activity were significantly enhanced by BLM stimulation. The BLM + palosuran treatment decreased prolidase activity in group 3. There was a positive correlation between prolidase activity and fibrosis scores. Palosuran seems to be effective in the treatment of lung fibrosis, and prolidase activity can be used for the diagnosis and/or for management of the treatment. However, further clinical and experimental studies with animals and/or patients are needed to verify these conclusions.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10753-012-9493-y
dc.identifier.endpage1752
dc.identifier.issn0360-3997
dc.identifier.issn1573-2576
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1251-3148
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4663-209X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6096-4042
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5255-0504
dc.identifier.pmid22717888
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84866730029
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1747
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-012-9493-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/61171
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000308653700017
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer/Plenum Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofInflammation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectprolidase
dc.subjectpalosuran
dc.subjectlung fibrosis
dc.titleProlidase Could Act as a Diagnosis and Treatment Mediator in Lung Fibrosis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar