Validity and reliability of Turkish version of St. George's respiratory questionnaire

dc.contributor.authorPolatli, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYorgancioglu, Arzu
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, Omer
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Nilgun Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorKirkil, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorNayci, Sibel Atis
dc.contributor.authorGunakan, Gonca
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:03:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The importance of the evaluation of health status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is recently highlighted in many studies. In this study, we aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in seven centers in Turkey. Three hundred and twenty one COPD patients (40-75 years) were included to the study. Turkish versions of breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS), mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) dyspnea scale, SGRQ, COPD assessment test (CAT) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were carried out to the patients. The statistical analysis of SGRQ was performed by using the coefficient of internal consistency, discriminative analysis for different stages and the correlation with the other scales. Results: The mean age was 62.4 +/- 8.9 years and the mean FEV1 was 51.9 +/- 19.2% pred. The coefficient of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) was 0.8815. The correlation between the total score measured initially and that obtained two weeks later was found to be highly significant (r= 0.90, p< 0.0001). According the results of validation of both total score and the components of SGRQ, the correlation between the total score of SGRQ and CAT was 0.782 (p< 0.0001), SGRQ and SF36 was between -0.481 ile -0.819 (p< 0.0001). The total and component scores were able to discriminate different disease stages and a significant correlation was found to be with pulmonary function tests. Conclusion: SGRQ Turkish version is a reliable and valid assessment tool for COPD patients in clinical practice.
dc.identifier.doi10.5578/tt.5404
dc.identifier.endpage87
dc.identifier.issn0494-1373
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8415-5717
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4459-232X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3050-1263
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4032-0944
dc.identifier.pmid23875584
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84880482823
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage81
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5578/tt.5404
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/48538
dc.identifier.volume61
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000421332900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Tuberculosis & Thorax
dc.relation.ispartofTuberkuloz ve Torak-Tuberculosis and Thorax
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectCOPD
dc.subjectSt. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
dc.subjectvalidity and reliability
dc.titleValidity and reliability of Turkish version of St. George's respiratory questionnaire
dc.title.alternativeSt. George solunum anketinin Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirli?i
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar