Does Double-layer Application of a Universal Adhesive Affect Its Bonding to Different Tooth Substrates?

dc.contributor.authorTekce, Aybuke Uslu
dc.contributor.authorAtalay, Cansu
dc.contributor.authorDursun, Meltem N.
dc.contributor.authorErtan, Atilla
dc.contributor.authorYazici, A. Ruya
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a single or double layer application of a Universal adhesive on bond strength to different tooth substrates. Methods: Seventy-two extracted sound human teeth were used for the study. The teeth were divided into three groups according to tooth substrates; enamel, coronal and radicular dentin (n=24). The roots of the teeth were separated from the crowns and then abraded to obtain flat surfaces. The specimens were randomly allocated into 2 groups in accordance with application layers of universal adhesive (n=12). The universal adhesive, Adhese Universal was applied in self-etch mode as single - or double-layer to different substrates. Following the adhesive application, enamel, coronal and radicular dentin substrates were restored with a resin composite (Tetric N-Ceram). The specimens were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test after storage in distilled water (37celcius, 24 h). Representative fractured and interface samples from each group were examined by a scanning electron microscope. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA(alpha = 0.05). Results: There was no statistically difference in SBS values between single - and double-layer applications of the tested universal adhesive on different dental substrates (p>0.05). Whilst no difference was occurred between the different dental substrates in the single-layer application (p>0.05), double-layer application on coronal dentin presented significantly higher bond strength than enamel (p<0.05). Conclusion: Double-layer application of the tested universal adhesive did not improve the bond strength regardless of different dental substrates.
dc.identifier.doi10.33808/clinexphealthsci.932520
dc.identifier.endpage800
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8972-8804
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7065-1421
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7200-5634
dc.identifier.startpage794
dc.identifier.trdizinid482633
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.932520
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/482633
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/49954
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000743967900028
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMarmara Univ, Inst Health Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Health Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectUniversal adhesive
dc.subjectShear bond strength
dc.subjectDouble-layer application
dc.titleDoes Double-layer Application of a Universal Adhesive Affect Its Bonding to Different Tooth Substrates?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar