The protective effect of cilostazol on transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in rats
| dc.contributor.author | Ozdemir, Ayfer | |
| dc.contributor.author | Orhan, Erkan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Altun, Serdar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Inozu, Emre | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:17:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is commonly used in breast reconstruction. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effects of cilostazol on TRAM flap viability in a rat TRAM model. Methods: Twenty-four Wistar rats were used. They were divided into four groups. Rats in Group 1 were applied TRAM flap. In Group 2, cilostazol 30 mg/kg was administered to rats via oral gavage 3 hours before the flap surgery. After the flap surgery, cilostazol 30mg/kg was administered via oral gavage twice a day for 7 days. In Group 3 before the flap surgery, cilostazol 30 mg/kg was administered via oral gavage twice a day for 7 days, and treatment continued for 7 more days after the flap surgery. In Group 4 before the flap surgery, cilostazol 30 mg/kg was administered via oral gavage twice a day for 7 days and treatment was discontinued after the flap surgery. Result: The mean necrosis rate in Group 1 was 41.69%, in Group 2 it was 27.0%, in Group 3 it was 6.66%, and in Group 4 it was 11.2%. The necrosis rate in Group 1 was found to be statistically significantly higher than other groups (p < .01), the necrosis rate in Group 2 was found to be statistically significant higher than Groups 3 and 4 (p < .01), and the necrosis rate in Group 4 was found to be statistically significant higher than Group 3 (p < .01). Conclusion: Cilostazol treatment seemed to increase the viability of TRAM flap, especially when administered as adjuvant therapy. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1237958 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 222 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2000-656X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2000-6764 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 27707079 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84990174347 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 217 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2016.1237958 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/52507 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 51 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000401517600011 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Medical Journal Sweden Ab | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | TRAM flap | |
| dc.subject | cilostazol | |
| dc.subject | flap viability | |
| dc.title | The protective effect of cilostazol on transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in rats | |
| dc.type | Article |







