As an analgesic ketamine versus fentanyl for total intravenous anesthesia

dc.contributor.authorEzici, Musa
dc.contributor.authorBestas, Azize
dc.contributor.authorErhan, Omer Lutfi
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:11:04Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstract[Abstract Not Available]
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1658-354X.109858
dc.identifier.endpage108
dc.identifier.issn0975-3125
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84876875587
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage107
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.109858
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/42279
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260511
dc.subjectfentanyl; ketamine; midazolam; propofol; abdominal surgery; adult; analgesia; anesthesia induction; anesthesia level; anesthetic recovery; disease severity; drug effect; drug safety; elective surgery; heart rate variability; hemodynamic monitoring; human; inguinal hernia; intravenous anesthesia; letter; major clinical study; male; mean arterial pressure; postoperative care; postoperative pain; priority journal; pulse oximetry; unspecified side effect
dc.titleAs an analgesic ketamine versus fentanyl for total intravenous anesthesia
dc.typeLetter

Dosyalar