Biomechanical Investigation of the Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Surfaces Placed With Allogeneic Bone Transfer

dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Erhan Cahit
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Melek Atille
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorTanrisever, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBal, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKarasu, Necmettin
dc.contributor.authorKirtay, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:21:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAllogeneic grafts can be preferred to autogenous grafts in plastic and oral-maxillofacial surgery for vertical and horizontal bone deficiencies. Implant surface properties are an important factor in osseointegration. This study aims to evaluate the osseointegration levels of titanium implants with machined, sand-blasted, and acid-etched (SLA) and resorbable blast material (RBM) surfaces placed together with allogeneic bone tissue transplantations obtained from the tibia bone using biomechanical method. Twenty-five female Sprague-Dawley rats were included in the study. The rats were divided into groups in which machined (n=7), SLA (n=7), and RBM (n=7) surface implants were placed with the transplantation of bone taken from the tibia. Four rats (both left and right tibias) were used as donors. Grafts and implants were surgically placed in the corticocancellous part of the metaphyseal area of the tibia bones of rats. At the end of the 4-week experimental setup, all rats were killed, and the implants and surrounding bone tissue were subjected to biomechanical reverse torque analysis (N/cm). Sand-blasted acid-etched surface implants were observed to have higher biomechanical osseointegration levels than RBM and machined surface implants (P<0.05). No statistical difference could be detected between the RBM and machined surface implants (P>0.05). On the basis of the limited results of this study, it can be concluded that the osseointegration levels of SLA surface implants placed with allogeneic bone transplantation may be better than those of machined and RBM surface implants.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Implance Dental Implant Systems, AGS Medical Corporation, Istanbul, Turkiye.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000010326
dc.identifier.endpage2188
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6849-0868
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2568-7470
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3815-8543
dc.identifier.pmid38781429
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85205859411
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage2184
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010326
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/53998
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001328281900077
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectAllogeneic bone transfer
dc.subjectbone-implant connection
dc.subjectbone-implant contact
dc.subjectbone transplantation
dc.subjectimplant surfaces
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.titleBiomechanical Investigation of the Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Surfaces Placed With Allogeneic Bone Transfer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar