Effects of different LED light curing units on the degree of conversion and microhardness of different composites: FT-IR and SEM-EDX analysis

dc.contributor.authorBilge, Kuebra
dc.contributor.authorIpek, Irem
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:38:59Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC), Vickers microhardness (VHN), main components and surface properties of a microhybrid and two bulk-fill composite resins polymerized with second and third generation light emitting diodes (LED). Sixty cylindrical specimens of Filtek (TM) Bulk-Fill, everX Posterior (bulk technique) and Filtek Z250 (incremental technique) were prepared in plexiglass molds (5 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness) and cured with second-generation LED (Woodpecker LED.B) and third-generation LED (Valo) resulting in six groups (n = 10). DC was determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and VHN with Vickers microhardness tester. The main components were identified by means of energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) microanalysis; whereas filler particles and surface properties were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). VHN and DC data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, followed by t-test with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparison (p < 0.05). When DC and VHN values were evaluated, after polymerization with second and third generation LED, there was a statistical difference in bulk-fill composites, while there was no statistical difference in microhybrid composite. While, the highest DC and VHN values were obtained after polymerization of Filtek Z250 with Valo, the lowest DC and VHN values were obtained with Filtek Bulk-Fill with Woodpecker LED.B. The degree of conversion and microhardness are affected by the structure of the composite resin and LEDs.
dc.description.sponsorshipFimath;rat University
dc.description.sponsorshipNo Statement Available
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00289-024-05362-2
dc.identifier.endpage13838
dc.identifier.issn0170-0839
dc.identifier.issn1436-2449
dc.identifier.issue15
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4323-9316
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85196012263
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage13825
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-024-05362-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/58652
dc.identifier.volume81
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001248305100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofPolymer Bulletin
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectComposite resin
dc.subjectFT-IR
dc.subjectLED units
dc.subjectMicrohardness
dc.subjectSEM-EDX
dc.titleEffects of different LED light curing units on the degree of conversion and microhardness of different composites: FT-IR and SEM-EDX analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar