Can combination of Day 3 and Day 5 embryo morphology be useful to predict pregnancy in in-vitro fertilization cycles?
| dc.contributor.author | Demir, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kose, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bozdag, G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sokmensuer, L. Karakoc | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sever, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gunalp, S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:10:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To determine whether embryos having all top qualified both on Day 3 and Day 5 have higher pregnancy rates than the others. Materials and Methods: The study included 143 consecutive cycles were recruited in which Day 5 embryo transfer was available. Cleavage stage embryos were graded according to 1 to 4 scoring system, based on fragmentation, cell symmetry, and blastomere number. Among cleavage stage embryos, Grade 1 and Grade 2a/2b were further stratified as 'top quality' embryos to be transferred, others were defined as control group. Blastocyst stage embryos were graded from 1 to 6 according to intracellular mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TB). Day 5 fresh embryo transfer was performed in all cases using soft catheter. Positive pregnancy test was accepted when serum beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (beta-hCG) exceeded 20 mIU/ml. Results: On the cleavage stage, top quality embryo was available in 47 of 143(32.9%) cases. Of the 47 embryos, the number of cases reaching any Grade 4, 3 quality, and early blastocyst on Day 5 were 22 (46.8%), 15 (31.9%), and 10 (21.3%). The respective figures on the control group (n=96) were 33 (34.4%), 37 (38.5%), and 26 (27.1%) (p > 0.05). The pregnancy rates were also similar. Conclusion: All top qualified embryos both on Day 3 and 5 did not reveal higher pregnancy rate than the others. | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 688 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0390-6663 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 25551963 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 685 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/50529 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 41 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000345819100017 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | I R O G Canada, Inc | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | Embryo morphology | |
| dc.subject | Blastocyst | |
| dc.subject | In vitro fertilization | |
| dc.title | Can combination of Day 3 and Day 5 embryo morphology be useful to predict pregnancy in in-vitro fertilization cycles? | |
| dc.type | Article |







