Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones greater than 2 cm

dc.contributor.authorKarakoc, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorKarakeci, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorOzan, Tunc
dc.contributor.authorFirdolas, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorTektas, Cihat
dc.contributor.authorOzkaratas, Sehmus Erdem
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Irfan
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T16:40:17Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm and to compare its results with those of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 143 patients: 86 patients (53 males and 33 females) who underwent PCNL and 57 patients (37 males and 20 females) who underwent RIRS between October 2009 and October 2013. Results: The mean duration of operation was 100.26 +/- 33.26 min in the RIRS group and 75.55 +/- 21.5 min in the PCNL group (p<0.001). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RIRS group (1.56 +/- 0.8 vs. 4.57 +/- 2.1 days in the RIRS and PCNL groups, respectively; p<0.001). Stone-free rates after one session were 66.6% and 91.8% of the RIRS and PCNL groups, respectively. The stone-free rate of the RIRS group improved to 87.7% after the second session. Blood transfusions were required in two patients in the PCNL group. Complication rates were higher in the PCNL group. Conclusion: This study revealed that RIRS can be an alternative to PCNL in the treatment of kidney stones with a diameter of 2-4 cm especially in patients with comorbidities.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tud.2015.97957
dc.identifier.endpage77
dc.identifier.issn2149-3235
dc.identifier.issn2149-3057
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2097-9853
dc.identifier.pmid26328205
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84930148149
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage73
dc.identifier.trdizinid175364
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2015.97957
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/175364
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/45341
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000360379300004
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAves
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Urology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectKidney stones
dc.subjectflexible ureteroscopy
dc.subjectpercutaneous nephrolithotomy
dc.subjectretrograde intrarenal surgery
dc.titleComparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones greater than 2 cm
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar