The comparison of treatment with clobetasol propionate 0.05% and topical pimecrolimus 1% treatment in the treatment of alopecia areata
| dc.contributor.author | Ucak, Haydar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kandi, Basak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cicek, Demet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Halisdemir, Nurhan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dertlioglu, Selma Bakar | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T17:46:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.department | Fırat Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is a non-scarring hair loss. Objective: We aimed the comparison of clobetasol propionate and pimecrolimus efficiency and tolerability in the treatment of AA. Methods: The study included a total of 100 consecutive patients with AA. Patients were randomized into four groups. 30 patients used 1% pimecrolimus cream, 30 patients used 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream, 20 patients used petrolatum as placebo. Scalp of 20 patients was divided into two equal areas and one area was treated with 1% pimecrolimus cream and the other area with 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream. Results: At week 12 of treatment, the recovery rate of the pimecrolimus group was 53.73 +/- 44.49 and the recovery score was 3.63 +/- 2.07; that of the clobetasol propionate group was 47.00 +/- 44.80 and the recovery score was 3.33 +/- 2.20; that of the placebo group was 35.50 +/- 40.53 and the recovery score was 2.75 +/- 1.88. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of the percentage of recovery and the recovery score (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, we detected that topical pimecrolimus treatment is as effective as topical corticosteroids and is superior to topical corticosteroids in terms of side effects in the treatment of AA. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3109/09546634.2011.590788 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 420 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0954-6634 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-2151-7917 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 21787210 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84869477709 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 410 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3109/09546634.2011.590788 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11508/61190 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 23 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000311236800005 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Informa Healthcare | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dermatological Treatment | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20260511 | |
| dc.subject | alopecia areata | |
| dc.subject | clobetasol propionate | |
| dc.subject | pimecrolimus | |
| dc.title | The comparison of treatment with clobetasol propionate 0.05% and topical pimecrolimus 1% treatment in the treatment of alopecia areata | |
| dc.type | Article |







